So I’ve realized that in conversations I’ll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I’ve been thinking that it’s not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

“What’s up guys?” “How’s it going man?” "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y’all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

  • maxprime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    A lot of people use “folks” for plural.

    I feel like “guys” is fairly un-gendered but people disagree with me. Personally, I haven’t used the word “guys” to refer to anything male in what seems like forever.

    “Bud” and “fella” are good singulars.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I used to have a maths teacher who called almost every number “guy”.

      “And this guy goes to zero, while this guy goes to infinity!”

    • unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I really, really wish we could degender “guy” and “guys”. I know plenty of people of all genders that use the words in general to describe people, objects, concepts, everything. The only holdouts are people that insist on it specifically meaning males. Ironically, these people are often the hardcore feminists.

      If other English words can change their meanings and be claimed/reclaimed by certain groups, why can’t others?

      Take guy! Use it to describe whatever you want! Free it of its historically phallic shackles!

      • fᵣₑfᵢ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I agree with you gal, while we’re at it I wish we could degender “gal”, “chick”, and “doll” too. Equality for all!

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          This sounds not to dissimilar to those who argued that legalizing gay marriage would lead to people marrying horses or their cars.

          • fᵣₑfᵢ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            How’s that? I’m not arguing against anything, I said I want more words to be disgendered

            How come people seem to only want words that were originally masculine coded words to be disgendered, but don’t want that for words that are originally feminine coded?

      • ready_for_qa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Guy was originally gender neutral as it was used to call someone stupidly bold (iirc). The term was most often used toward a single gender that was known for being stupidly bold and became synonymous with that gender. That’s how it became gendered.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m a cis woman in IT, I’m guy, dude, man, bro… I don’t really care. You can change to make a specific person feel more confortable but most woman don’t care to be dude or guy

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Guys” is ungendered.

      Reconsider whether it’s worth being friends with people that insist on fighting over the term “guys”.

      And if you are surrounded by a lot of particularly sensitive people, just call them “friend” or “friends”. It works for people you both like and dislike. Glorious.

      • maxprime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure, but as a professional (teacher) I’m not willing to put my career on the line by challenging a sensitive parent. A few years ago we were told not to use that word, and when it comes to things like that, I do as I’m told.

      • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Modifying my language choices is literally the least I can do to make people feel more included, so anyone who can’t fathom doing that is for sure, not worthy of being a friend.

      • mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If you are in the Midwest, Guys is absolutely gender neutral.

        Edit: downvote me all you want guys, it won’t change the truth.

  • RampageDon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    A wise man once said, “I’m a dude, he’s a dudes, she’s a dude. We’re all dudes. Hey!”

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Strange though, that when you ask most men how many dudes they’ve slept with suddenly, she’s not a dude…

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a very big difference between “dude”, referring to someone you’re talking to, and “a dude”, referring to someone you were talking about.

          • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s like the difference between “my shit”, “your shit”, and “that shit”. You’re not actually referring to your own things as feces, or calling it “shitty”. It’s just your shit. As in “Don’t touch my shit”. But when you’re referring to someone else’s shit as “your shit” or “that shit” it’s more derogatory. Like, “clean up that shit” or “get your shit out of here”.

            The context changes “shit” from derogatory to neutral. Similarly, “dude” can be both gender specific and neutral depending on context.

            Note that people are still allowed to prefer not to be referred to as “dude”, but it’s a gender neutral term in many contexts nonetheless.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            In the '60s, I made love to many, many women, often outdoors, in the mud and the rain, and it’s possible a man slipped in. There would be no way of knowing.

      • TheBest@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ive generally always agreed with the former comment, but I’ve heard this argument a few times and it does demonstrate the disconnect well. I’ve switched it up to a simple y’all.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yep. Something that can only ever mean “neutral” or “man” isn’t neutral

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just how our language works. You can also use the word “fuck” in many ways that have wildly different meanings.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s funny how “just how it works out” always leads to “neutral” words having double meanings that equal “man” but never “woman”

          Maybe it’s not “just how it works” and maybe it’s just bias…

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re literally arguing that this word should specifically exclude women, while complaining that double meanings never include women. It makes no sense. Why wouldn’t you want to take power over the word to make it apply to women too?

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              There is no world where “Check out that dude” will mean a woman.

              It will always be “neutral” or masculine.

              And that’s not neutral.

              I have zero interest in fake neutrality

              • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                That’s because context matters.

                “You’re shit” and “You’re the shit” mean completely different things

                • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Of course. No one literally thinks that “dude” always means man.

                  The issue isn’t the obvious truth of the different meanings. The issue is that those different meanings aren’t neutral like they claim to be, because they rely on the idea of men being the “default” state of people.

                  There’s a reason there isn’t exactly a large number of words in use that can men “woman” and “everybody” and that’s because most men would be uncomfortable with that.

                  Yet somehow, the opposite is fine?

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        As a former resident of San Diego I have no problem sleeping with dudes. Because everyone is dude.

        People think they’re clever when they ask “would you sleep with the dude?” My response is " bold of you to assume that I haven’t." Everyone is dude. You can try to twist things as much as you like but dude normalization reigns supreme.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was talking about the default assumptions people make when they hear the word. Your circumstances don’t come in to it, unless your claim is that most people share your experiences

          • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            In San Diego the default assumption of “dude” is that it can be literally anyone or any thing.

            The people there accepted this decades ago. It’s not one person’s experience. It’s a shared experience of millions. It’s a geographically specific situation with the Smurf language phenomenon. Any noun can be Smurf and everyone there understands the smurfing meaning when it’s smurfing said.

    • Late2TheParty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Out of the mouth of babes… 🥰

      I believe that sentiment was also uttered by another wise man. A man of his time. Mr. Jeffrey Lebowski.

    • yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I say “greetings earthling(s)” but I also like gumshoe! Also definitely adding “listen up assholes” to the rotation, my coworkers appreciate your suggestions!

      • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

        Yo!

        Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

        I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

  • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s up, cunts

    Works best if they’re your friends and also you’re in Australia

  • PM_me_trebuchets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m AFAB enby, saying “you guys” and calling me “dude” is fine. Those to me aren’t gendered anymore. The people who get offended at general terms like these for groups of people need to touch grass.

    But if you’re dead set on it, embrace y’all lol. Just don’t say it with a southern drawl and you’ll be fine. It’s a fantastic gender neutral term. You can also just train yourself not to add in the “you guys” to the “what’s up” phrase, and maybe just say “what’s up with you?” “What’s up with you all?” Etc.

    • lembas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Offended” is a bit of a strong word.

      Many trans folks are, understandably, bummed out when gendered terms that refer to their AGAB are used to refer to them.

      I don’t think there’s anything wrong with trying to avoid causing that brief moment of dysphoria. That just feels like a thoughtful and kind thing to do.

      • PM_me_trebuchets@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s good that OP means well, but also there are so many of us who do not care and are not affected because we know the speaker is using a generalized term and isn’t (usually) being malicious with it. I call several of my cisgender girl friends “dude” and “bro” and I’ll call men “girl” as a joke sometimes (like, girl what are you doing?). Many of these terms simply have completely lost their original gendered meaning in a lot of contexts.

        • lembas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s great, and it’s nice that you don’t have to deal with that jolt of dysphoria in those situations.

          I’m simply saying that it’s also common (and okay) to not be entirely comfortable with those terms. Especially from strangers or acquaintances.

          I don’t think seeking to reduce the linguistic pattern of male as the default is a misguided effort.

        • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m also on Team “these words have lost their meaning” but often feel opposite to OP’s intent

          When people go out of their way to force inclusive language to a degree that feels unnatural, and especially when I’m the only trans person in the room, it feels like I’m being singled out for my identity. It’s extra uncomfortable when they make (often incorrect) assumptions about my body while doing so.

          That said, I will also never fault someone for trying to be inclusive, and ofc always respect other people’s preferences.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No southern drawl? Y’all is like our one positive contribution don’t take it away from those of us who ain’t bigots

    • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can also just train yourself not to add in the “you guys” to the “what’s up” phrase, and maybe just say “what’s up with you?” “What’s up with you all?” Etc.

      This is likely the best solution, but also a hard one. Thanks for the perspective though.

  • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    The simplest approach is to accept language is inherently gendered, and at a certain point it is exhausting to either take offense to everything or walk on eggshells.

    I’m southern, so I use y’all almost exclusively lol