• AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    from my anecdotal experience, that would mean 100 % of it was generated, but 70% of it didnt compile and needed to be changed by a human.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They’re counting intellisense auto complete in this percentage. Which is extremely misleading. And it’s also only new code.

    • Skyline969@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      In which way, do you think? People will write even more code with AI, or people realize it’s a bad idea and stop?

      • porthos@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        This is just advertising they cut and devalued their human talent and telling on themselves that not only from a business perspective but also from a basic cultural perspective they have brain worms and will be unable to rationalize in their tiny addled minds rehiring human talent and treating them well as a solution until it is far too late.