• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is it really a decade old? Feels like they redesign it every three years.

    Redesigning familiar UIs is a great way to give elderly, neuroatypical, and/or computer illiterate people a hard time.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        haha. My bad, sorry. I think people used to say this but the language changed. I’ll fix it.

        • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hate to be that guy, but it’s neurodivergent. :) neurodiverse is another thing. Everyone is diverse but not everyone is divergent.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah! Thank you again! Honestly in my mind I was thinking that “neurodiverse” didn’t make any sense. Okay now I’m interested to see what the next ‘that guy’ is going to say :)

  • MichaelMuse@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbiIBcUD1VY This video provides a step-by-step guide on how to revert a new, undesirable layout to a previous version. The instructions are presented in a sequential manner, utilizing links provided in the video description to install necessary components and configure settings.

    • Step 1-4: Clicking on links provided in the description to install required elements (likely browser extensions or related software).
    • Step 5: Another click on a link in the description to install an additional component.
    • Step 6: Accessing the installed extension’s settings and applying a filter provided by the creator (presumably to address a specific visual issue).
    • Refresh: Refreshing the webpage to apply the changes.
    • Issue: The fix may remove access to the sidebar if used, a sacrifice the user must make.

    use the transcriptly to get this video transcript and summary.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The removal of the black gradient at the bottom is a plus.

    Putting the controls in their own grey capsules so they still standout is a plus.

    The moving of the volume button to the right is a negative.

    I dont like change just for changes sake, but in fairness some of this is a good idea and a welcome design shift. I just hopebthey move the volume button back as having on the left with the main controls is pretty widespread and common design.

    • kolorafa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      On top od that it takes more vertical space so more % of the video is covered by controls that are not that transparent so the whole control block is covering it in full comparing to previous where only the actual icons and text did cover the video with the gradient to help make it visible if video is the same color.

      But one way or another I avoid yt so it doesnt really affect me.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A rare, levelheaded take.

      The changes are fine. Nothing earth shattering, nothing wildly or fundamentally broken, just a visual update to better fit with Google’s new material design language.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The articles mentions that scroll and the arrow keys no longer adjust volume. Nothing could be earth shattering because it’s video streaming software, but it does seem to come with some functionality loss at this stage.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I only think they should have moved the controls outside of the video, at least on desktop

      • Raltoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s been a few years sine youtube stopped making changes designed for desktop. These days they work with a “Made for tablet, compatible for desktop” mindset.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Apart from the key bind loss, which would be asinine to remove permanently, this looks like a straight upgrade. Better readability and more in line with the rest of the UI design.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m indifferent to it. The jarring years were 2006 up to about 2015. It would shift between better and worse until it reached the point where the front page was all clickbait/ragebait/advertisements and you had to rely on your own subscriptions page. Every social media site should default to subscribed/followed stuff for logged in users but got to selll paid to promote content

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know why anyone would willingly default to the algorithm, I set my bookmark direct to the subscription page.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because the seek bar overlaps the video as it is playing, and because the drag button is huge whenever you mouseover it, it is much harder to locate chapter marker visually.

      Change for the sake of change is not good.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Eh, it’s a fine line tbh. Not that I enjoy defending Google.

        You get both “this UI hasn’t changed in a decade” and “this UI is perfect never change it” in relatively equal amounts. The rest honestly don’t care either way.

        • NRay7882@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Imagine if they actually brought back “options” and let you choose between changes rather than force them on you.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That would turn into spaghetti code and unmaintainable tech debt really fast. Now every time you make a change you have to make sure it doesn’t break previous stylesheets, or you need to run different versions of the same codebase for each stylesheet that will need updating for security vulnerabilities and stakeholder whims.

              • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Then it becomes harder to change when you want to add in new features still. There needs to be a fine balance between giving options and having a clean single-option code, and offering 2 different video players is not it (it sounds like some shortcuts got broken so it’s not just a CSS that got applied)

                • AugustWest@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You are right. I forgot we were talking about a web front end, and I was think of an application. I take it back.

                  I am just so used to watching you tube with applications on desktop and mobile I forgot we were talking about you tubes new web front end.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Looks the same to me on a PC. Up/down arrows still adjust the volume. Scroll wheel on my mouse scrolls the entire screen as always. Do the changes only affect touchscreen devices?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same. Money says that people bitching are on phones. Fair enough I guess, but I’m not fucking around watching video on a palm screen. I’ll wait till I get home and have a 40" TV to view.

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Things like this roll out to more people over time. It’s clearly desktop, both from the screenshots and the fact people are complaining they can’t use the scroll wheel to change the volume while hovering over the volume button. That’s a desktop thing.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s all relative. If i sit a few meters away from a 50 inch screen, then it’s roughly the same size as a phone screen held 30cm from my face. It’s just a matter of perspective.

          The level of detail i can see is the same. My fancy earbuds make the sound quality essentially the same if not better.

          The only real difference is i have to hold the phone to watch it.

          Well, most people… not me, I have a folding phone with a stand, so for me, i can comfortably put the phone on a table on the stand that’s built into the case and watch from there. Works just fine.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’d have to hold me phone so close to my face I can’t comfortably focus on it to match the relative size of my computer monitor, and it’s not a big monitor. Why would I settle for the jumbotron from the cheap seats when I can sit front row?

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The heck is this title?

    YouTube says goodbye to decade-old video player UI, but users hate the new design

    Meanwhile, the article itself just cites a few tiny aesthetic changes and like four random Reddit comments. Doesn’t seem like they even tried it themself… That’s justifications for 460 upvotes?

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s like the same but with a background color that has rounded corners.