He probably named them individually in the suit in addition to the company. One could argue he’s alleging that the named parties all personally engaged in towing his vehicle.
Classic SovCit “logic”, can’t be held responsible for their actions because that was the company set up in their name not their living person, but then tries to hold a company and other individual persons responsible for shit they don’t like
It’s actually not that weird to do this. You just scattershot everyone involved and let them figure out who acted on behalf of whom. If you don’t, the company could just say “hey, these guys are self-employed and just lease our impound yard” and you’d have to file a whole new suit.
Soooo he didn’t even go after the correct towing company.
He probably named them individually in the suit in addition to the company. One could argue he’s alleging that the named parties all personally engaged in towing his vehicle.
Classic SovCit “logic”, can’t be held responsible for their actions because that was the company set up in their name not their living person, but then tries to hold a company and other individual persons responsible for shit they don’t like
It’s actually not that weird to do this. You just scattershot everyone involved and let them figure out who acted on behalf of whom. If you don’t, the company could just say “hey, these guys are self-employed and just lease our impound yard” and you’d have to file a whole new suit.