The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Regardless of who is in the right or wrong here, please don’t post personally identifiable information if the source is not public.

      While it’s important to push for justice and fairness, there’s a distinction between advocating for fairness and doxxing / calling for mob justice. We don’t have formal rules for this stuff yet, but use your best judgment and report any comments that veer into harmful territory.

      I’ll try to post a discussion thread on proposed rules sometime in the future, but this seems like a good one to bring up in the meantime. Feel free to share thoughts, and thank you :)

    • Smk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Before mobbing the landlord, it would be a good idea to know what’s the real story behind this. Maybe the sisters were assholes. We don’t know that.

        • Smk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha, I’m not! But I would be intrigued to know what’s the real reason behind the landlord’s move. I know we like to believe that all landlord are assholes but let’s love in reality where nuance is everything shall we ?

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya. It sounds like they wanted to raise the rent to $3500 which the landlord clearly thought was being reasonable for this building. They bitched about it so the landlord raised the rent high enough to get rid of them.

        Sounds like the gambled and lost. Instead of going to the news, they should have tried to negotiate back to $3500 or something close. Good luck now.

          • ddkman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This really depends. If the building is rentable for 5000 than it is. Like it or not.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If 2500 was reasonable back then, then it still is reasonable right now.

              Unless gigantic upgrades were performed to the house that warrant a 1000 price hike, which I highly doubt.

              Just because the market is fucked doesn’t mean you get to make the market even worse.

              • ddkman@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except the price of food building materials renovation costs went up by about 100% where i live realistically. So a landlord isn’t going to just take the fact that their 2500 whatever is now only worth 1700 whatevers.

              • Rocket@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If accepting a lease on a post-2018 construction, knowing that no rent control was in force, was reasonable then, it is still reasonable now. Live with your choices.