The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This really depends. If the building is rentable for 5000 than it is. Like it or not.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If 2500 was reasonable back then, then it still is reasonable right now.

        Unless gigantic upgrades were performed to the house that warrant a 1000 price hike, which I highly doubt.

        Just because the market is fucked doesn’t mean you get to make the market even worse.

        • ddkman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except the price of food building materials renovation costs went up by about 100% where i live realistically. So a landlord isn’t going to just take the fact that their 2500 whatever is now only worth 1700 whatevers.

        • Rocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If accepting a lease on a post-2018 construction, knowing that no rent control was in force, was reasonable then, it is still reasonable now. Live with your choices.