• doctordevice@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because it’s not the clause that invokes racism, it’s the practice of slavery. The clause, as Douglass points out, promotes freedom.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He also points out it’s about black people. Why are you ignoring that part when you quoted it?

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m not. I’m objecting to your saying the clause was racist when its very purpose was anti-slavery. Slavery is the thing that is racist.

        I think a Civil War era leader on abolitionism and civil rights would know what he’s talking about when he describes the clause as supporting his cause.

          • doctordevice@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think you should read it again. He’s saying even taking the worst possible interpretation, the clause promotes freedom for slaves.