• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    He also points out it’s about black people. Why are you ignoring that part when you quoted it?

    • doctordevice@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m not. I’m objecting to your saying the clause was racist when its very purpose was anti-slavery. Slavery is the thing that is racist.

      I think a Civil War era leader on abolitionism and civil rights would know what he’s talking about when he describes the clause as supporting his cause.

        • doctordevice@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think you should read it again. He’s saying even taking the worst possible interpretation, the clause promotes freedom for slaves.