200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-22 months agoAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: stuffandsuch@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.com200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square18linkfedilinkcross-posted to: stuffandsuch@lemmy.world
minus-squarezogwarg@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoFunnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.
Funnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.