In the past months, there’s a been a issue in various instances where accounts would start uploading blatant CSAM to popular communities. First of all this traumatizes anyone who gets to see it before the admins get to it, including the admins who have to review to take it down. Second of all, even if the content is a link to an external site, lemmy sill caches the thumbnail and stores it in the local pict-rs, causing headaches for the admins who have to somehow clear that out. Finally, both image posts and problematic thumbnails are federated to other lemmy instances, and then likewise stored in their pict-rs, causing such content to be stored in their image storage.

This has caused multiple instances to take radical measures, from defederating liberaly, to stopping image uploads to even shutting down.

Today I’m happy to announce that I’ve spend multiple days developing a tool you can plug into your instance to stop this at the source: pictrs-safety

Using a new feature from pictr-rs 0.4.3 we can now cause pictrs to call an arbitary endpoint to validate the content of an image before uploading it. pictrs-safety builds that endpoint which uses an asynchronous approach to validate such images.

I had already developed fedi-safety which could be used to regularly go through your image storage and delete all potential CSAM. I have now extended fedi-safety to plug into pict-rs safety and scan images sent by pict-rs.

The end effect is that any images uploaded or federated into your instance will be scanned in advance and if fedi-safety thinks they’re potential CSAM, they will not be uploaded to your image storage at all!

This covers three important vectors for abuse:

  • Malicious users cannot upload CSAM to for trolling communities. Even novel GenerativeAI CSAM.
  • Users cannot upload CSAM images and never submit a post or comment (making them invisible to admins). The images will be automatically rejected during upload
  • Deferated images and thumbnails of CSAM will be rejected by your pict-rs.

Now, that said, this tool is AI-driven and thus, not perfect. There will be false positives, especially around lewd images and images which contain children or child-topics (even if not lewd). This is the bargain we have to take to prevent the bigger problem above.

By my napkin calculations, false positive rates are below 1%, but certainly someone’s innocent meme will eventually be affected. If this happen, I request to just move on as currently we don’t have a way to whitelist specific images. Don’t try to resize or modify the images to pass the filter. It won’t help you.

For lemmy admins:

  • pictrs-safety contains a docker-compose sample you can add to your lemmy’s docker-compose. You will need to your put the .env in the same folder, or adjust the provided variables. (All kudos to @Penguincoder@beehaw.org for the docker support).
  • You need to adjust your pict-rs ENVIRONMENT as well. Check the readme.
  • fedi-safety must run on a system with GPU. The reason for this is that lemmy provides just a 10-seconds grace period for each upload before it times out the upload regardless of the results. A CPU scan will not be fast enough. However my architecture allows the fedi-safety to run on a different place than pictrs-safety. I am currently running it from my desktop. In fact, if you have a lot of images to scan, you can connect multiple scanning workers to pictrs-safety!
  • For those who don’t have access to a GPU, I am working on a NSFW-scanner which will use the AI-Horde directly instead and won’t require using fedi-safety at all. Stay tuned.

For other fediverse software admins

fedi-safety can already be used to scan your image storage for CSAM, so you can also protect yourself and your users, even on mastodon or firefish or whatever.

I will try to provide real-time scanning in the future for each software as well and PRs are welcome.

Divisions by zero

This tool is already active now on divisions by zero. It’s usage should be transparent to you, but do let me know if you notice anything wrong.

Support

If you appreciate the priority work that I’ve put in this tool, please consider supporting this and future development work on liberapay:

https://liberapay.com/db0/

All my work is and will always be FOSS and available for all who need it most.

  • kreynen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like progress, but please consider using a term other than “whitelist” when describing a list of allowed values. While the use of blacklist predates references to black as a race, allowlist is a reasonable alternative that doesn’t reinforce viewing black as less than or unwanted and white as allowed.

    • S410@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Making things that were never about race into things about race, just to have one more reason to be potentially offended by, is not productive and doesn’t help anyone.

      By exercising enough mental gymnastics almost any term could be twisted into something supposedly offensive. The real solution to that problem: don’t do mental gymnastics.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are technical terms that have nothing to do with race or even humans.

    • e-ratic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh come on… The origin of blacklist was centuries before “black” became the term for a person of colour. And on a thread about CSAM…

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Allowlist and Blocklist are also more intuitive to people who haven’t heard the terms before.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve honestly always found “allowlist” and “blocklist” to feel like forced compound words, and I don’t see why “list” is necessary at all. For example, just saying “allowed” and “blocked” both implies it’s a list and is more intuitive than any of the *list terms.

        Personally I have no stake in the battle, but I do wish people would use the most intuitive terms for the situation at least (whatever they are, for example “enabled”/“disabled” or “included”/“excluded”) instead of blanket ctrl+f on everything.

        • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a good point, and I hadn’t thought about that angle, that there just isn’t a reason for the terms to exist in the first place.

          “In the red” and “in the black” is another pair that isn’t intuitive to me at all and I have to look up every time.