• PizzaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I do not accept your attempt to move the goal posts. Your claim was about whether conviction was necessary. It is not.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not moving the goalpost.

      I suspect because he was never part of a rebellion, has not been charged with it or convicted of it, scotus will reject the courts opinion. The previous cases didn’t need a conviction because it was considered de facto