A former Bay Area tech CEO was fired earlier this year after allegedly enslaving, torturing, and sexually abusing his assistant. He claims the pair had a consensual relationship that people would “celebrate” if it were fictitious.

Former Tradeshift CEO Christian Lanng denied the allegations levied against him and the billion-dollar company he co-founded that were made by a former employee in court Thursday.

"The shocking and vile claims in the lawsuit are categorically false, and I reject allegations that I subjected someone to any form of abuse during my tenure as CEO or at any other time of my life,” Lanng told The Messenger.

In the complaint, an unidentified woman alleged that Lanng sent her into “a dark abyss of unwanted sexual horror," according to The Mercury News.

  • joystick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    Don’t know either of them, but have to doubt her unwillingness based on the fact that any reasonable person I know would never sign or do that if they weren’t into it.

    • Shirasho@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fear and power do a lot, and there is a whole legal section about how contracts signed under duress against the person’s interests are not legally binding.

      Like you, this is the first I’ve heard of this so I don’t have any opinions at this time.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Some people get off on being abused by those with more power than them.

        I think they call it a ‘kink.’ I don’t think we should shame them for it.

        Also something about this guy being a millionaire probably made him very attractive.

        Let’s see how much money she can get out of him before we pass any judgement, though.

        • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Straight to slut shaming, cool. Great contribution. You’re trying to appear “neutral” but your true colors fly bright and clear through your words.

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Your first sentence in your previous comment:

              Some people get off on being abused by those with more power than them.

              It reads as if your initial response to this happening was to say “she wanted it”, which is pretty terrible.

              • chitak166@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                11 months ago

                And what about my second and third sentences? Did you just ignore those?

                You’re the only one who’s shaming them.

                • stoy@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Your second sentence clearly kink shamed, even if you wrote that you didn’t.

                  Your third sentence is just more of the same crap.

                  You are just either a troll or an idiot, and I have better things to do than to argue with either.

                  • chitak166@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Okay, believe whatever you want. Me literally saying we shouldn’t shame them I guess is me shaming them.

                    Have a nice day, I’m going to ignore you because I’m tired of your insults.

      • joystick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Calm down. What evidence is there? It’s a he said she said. We don’t know who is lying.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unfortunately manipulation, coercion, grooming, etc do exist.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        More specifically, “this person enjoys being abused as can clearly be seen by the fact that they engage in contractual BDSM, a well-known device that kinksters use to negotiate BDSM power exchange.”

        The only unethical thing here was hiring the person he was dating - this article is exactly why you don’t do that.

        Everything described her aside from their unethical relationship is a sign of a loving kink relationship - like being collared is generally considered a big relationship step in BDSM. This looks like stupidity biting him in the ass more than it looks like abuse.

        • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          So any time a contract is signed it’s never coerced or forced in any way? Looks like you figured out abuse. Just make them sign a contract and you’re scott free.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that everything described in the article is indicative of these two engaging consensually in the BDSM lifestyle. His mistake was getting his girlfriend a job as his secretary as that adds an ethical component they were not fulfilling.

            To people outside of a BDSM relationship, these things can be shocking. I am extremely aware of that. However, anyone in the BDSM lifestyle can instantly recognize what happened here and what mistakes were made.

            If you’d like more info on contracts, collaring, and the BDSM lifestyle, here is a good resource:

            https://kinkyevents.co.uk/bdsm-contracts-a-beginners-guide/

            https://www.serenityinchains.com/what-is-a-bdsm-collar-aka-bondage-collar-and-what-does-it-mean/

            The fallout here is similar to a friend of mine being investigated by police after his wife had some serious bruising her coworkers noticed. Not all violence is unwelcome. They cleared it up in one conversation, because they were smart enough to not mix work and play, with all the ethical quandaries that involves.