• HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, they shure as shit don’t have a problem giving their “food” away now. The truth is most likely that telling their investors that they won’t make so much money will be a devastating financial blow.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        In our local fast foods most places are already advertising at least $19 hour for new hires. Is also over $20 for a kids meal and one adult meal “deal”, which takes less than 5-6 minutes to sell me.

        They’re raking it in.

        • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, my kid worked at a McD and got so much free food and not the stuff they are about to throw, but he would straight up make himself a quarter pounder combo, and then make me one fresh for free as many times as he wanted. He even would stop by on his off days, walk in and cook himself something and they didn’t care because of how much money they brought in. It was stupid and they should definitely raise the salaries of their employees instead of just showering them with free McD food.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      The group said the costs “simply cannot be absorbed by the business model.”

      They can do business, just not be as profitable if they can’t pay slave wages. The problem here is in the quote… they don’t want to change the model where the franchisee’s earn a little less and their crews can actually afford rent.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    To quote FDR:

    In my Inaugural I laid down the simple proposition that nobody is going to starve in this country. It seems to me to be equally plain that no business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We need an FDR. I’d take a modern Roosevelt. Any of them, assuming they keep up with the times (equality, similar).

      Any = FDR, Eleanor, Teddy

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need to be bailed out for the stupid mistakes you made with your business you don’t deserve to have a business. Why stop at wages.

  • hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy who owns the franchise my nephew worked at in high school drove an actual Rolls Royce. He owned a few, but goddamn. The guy who owned the franchise I worked at 20 years earlier owned like 3 houses or something and flew planes as a hobby (idk if he owned one).

    Excuse me for not giving a shit about a financial blow to people like them.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    And? Of course it’ll cost them money. They have been hoarding pay increases for years. 8f your business model doesn’t support paying a decent wage, your business model sucks.

    • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, wasn’t this the whole point of capitalism or something? If you can’t compete in the free market then gtfo and all that

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s what it says, but it’s just marketing. Capitalists don’t actually believe in fair competition. They believe in themselves having all the stuff, not anyone else, by any means necessary.

      • Jas91a@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except when big Business expect government handouts then they’re okay with socialism

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure most of their employees will still draw public assistance to supplement their basic needs. Fuck these companies.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Boo hoo. If you can’t run your business without exploiting the fuck out of people then you don’t deserve to be in business. Fuck off already your food is SHIT.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    If, like me, you’re concerned that franchisees may not be able to raise prices and offset this $250k in yearly expenses, worry no more because they totally can.

    This whole complaint is nonsense. That’s a trivial markup per food item.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can, and they always do. Yet for some reason people argue that they won’t, every time wage increases become a conversation.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, their problem is they already planned to increase prices with zero added benefit to employees or customers. Asking them to actually contribute something in exchange for their gains? Psshhh

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but now they’ll increase them twice, or twice as much. I know, I know, there are economic studies that say otherwise and the general consensus on the left is that prices don’t increase when wages do. I recognize that personal experience doesn’t hold a candle to scientific information. Yet, every single time I’ve seen wages go up in my entire life, the prices soon follow, wiping out the improvements for minimum wage workers and further eroding spending power for the middle class. The poor stay just as poor, the middle class shrinks a little, and the wealthy aren’t impacted at all. I’ve read studies that say differently, but it’s pretty hard to ignore a lifetime of experience. Now please recognize that I’m not advocating against a wage increase. I’m advocating for a law alongside the wage increase that blocks any associated price increases.

          • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not a bad idea.

            What would also help is an actually meaningful wage increase that isn’t just a handful of crumbs thrown out to give politicians something to brag on for their campaigns. Something that actually keeps pace with the cost of living increases, and makes up for decades of failing to make such increases.

            I suspect your right, though, that it will always end up with the wealthy even wealthier, until we address them directly and start making laws with teeth that curb their hoarding of that wealth and stomp on their ability to influence policy with it.

      • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Restricting your own wage increase in the hope that companies won’t add to inflation is very much like trying to be extra nice to an abusing partner in the hope that they won’t hit you.

        I know that you later wrote that you’re in favor of a law restricting their ability to increase prices so please take this as an aside.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, how many burgers would a staff of three people push out every hour? 100? If their wages went from $15 to $20 that’s an increase of $15 an hour or an extra $0.15 increased burger cost.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      McDonald’s used to be relatively cheap.

      Now it costs as much as a lot of the sit down restaurants in my area. Getting out for under $16 is a task and it’s more likely gonna cost me $20+.

      Wendy’s is still affordable for the most part and has taken over those times I’d normally go to McDonald’s.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only decently affordable fast food places are wendys and taco bell. Atleast that ive noticed from the big ones. The local ones can still be cheap.

        • June@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wingstop is pretty decently priced too.

          Panda Express was too but stopped being reasonable around the time they launched their rewards program.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I live in a small town, McDonald’s is the only “fast food” place here until last week when a Popeye’s chicken opened. That place had been packed every day since they opened. You can get an equivalent meal for two at nearly the price of one meal at McDonald’s.

        Plus the food at Popeye’s is way better.

  • llamapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not like $20/ hr is even that much money - ~40k a year probably won’t even qualify you to rent an apartment most places anyone wants to live.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      God it’s so wild. When I was a teenager $20/hour was good money. That’s just 20 years ago. Now it’s impossible to live on that wage in my area.

      • llamapocalypse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, doing some quick math, if the rental wants 3x the rent in income to qualify and you make $40k, you’re at best going to be able to qualify for something that runs ~$1100. That’s a really crappy 1-bedroom in my medium-sized FL city if you’re really lucky.

        • June@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          1100 is the floor for a shitty 1 bed in my city.

          Someone that has a teenager who needs their own room is going to pay no less than $1650 according to the Zillow search I just did.