Which provides more shelter for species biodiversity: a large, continuous tract of forest, or a number of small forest fragments that add up to the same land area? This question has divided the scientific community for more than 50 years, and a recently published study led by a Brazilian scientist has brought the topic back […]
  • The scientific community has been divided since the 1970s as to which sort of forest offers more protection for biodiversity: a set of many small patches of forest, or a single large tract?
  • A newly published study has rekindled the debate, backing the thesis that large expanses of green space are more important for species conservation, particularly for larger animals that require a more extensive range.
  • The debate could help policymakers better direct conservation efforts and funding, but researchers agree that all standing forest, regardless of size, must be protected.

archived (Wayback Machine)