• christrix22@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why should be a problem. From a sporting point of view one wants to play for United the other one want to leave. If you talk about personal life, if a person was legally found not guilty who am i or you to question that without knowing all the facts. Ronaldo was accused of rape and there was no backlash no suspension. And many others. Many PL teams didn’t even suspended players while they were investigated, Liverpool included.

      • Intilleque@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stop lying. Flanagan was accused of assaulting his girlfriend while at Liverpool and he was cut immediately. Lmao just admit you don’t mind abusers and women beaters as long as they play for your team and keep it at that. Greenwood was never charged because the gf dropped the charges not because he wasn’t guilty of anything. But then again, I would expect someone defending women abusers to try and use the “he wasn’t charged” argument.

        • staycoolwilson@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seriously mate?

          Flanagan wasn’t even a starter for Liverpool at the time so they couldn’t even drop him, also Liverpool didn’t even get rid when he was found guilty and continued to pay him for the rest of the season! Do you get things wrong on purpose?

    • Spreeg@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess the difference is they thought they could just wait out his outrage and then have him back