• PizzaMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden stopped exploration of new drill sites, that will decrease supply, which it did, less supply increases cost to the consumer.

    Which is why I said “indirect and minimal”. The other causes are much stronger.

      • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        When Biden opened up leases guess what happened, the price went down.

        Cool. Doesn’t change the fact that the president has a minimal effect.

        Government spending has a direct correlation to inflation.

        I am aware.

          • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fuel prices rising 30% after Biden shut down leases then fell 25% when he opened them back up. Sure seems like he has an effect.

            Correlation does not imply causation. You’re applying 100% of the cause to Biden due to correlation when in reality Biden is only a small part.

            The Biden was the one who approved the budget, he threatened to veto if spending items were cut. He could have vetoed unless spending was cut. He didn’t and now we have inflation.

            Again, it takes a long time for government policy to influence inflation, and so what we are currently experiencing is largely from Trump’s administration. And again, a big chunk of the “inflation” isn’t actually inflation but instead corporate greed. And third, sometimes spending is necessary to avoid a bigger disaster.