• gust334@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t work for or at Intel.

    But I would be surprised if their future direction was “simply more of the same.”

    At some point, I would expect further differentiation between cores, e.g. not just E and P cores, but more letters of the alphabet, with different specializations per core type.

    Maybe Arc moves into the main processor as A and/or G cores. Maybe an L and/or I core variant derived from E for even lower power when idle. Maybe yet more cores dialed in for bursty network traffic or sustained numerical workloads or equal-path crypto engines or who knows what.

  • hackenclaw@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we went from quad core 7700K to 24 cores 13900K within 6 yrs.

    Why wouldnt be possible to have 64 cores in far future?

  • Mysterious_Poetry62@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    no, I wish for all p cores like my i9 9900kf. a very fast CPU at 5200 and no overheating. Think if they made a all p core many of us would take a serious look.

  • Mysterious_Poetry62@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    do have to say that that many cores in a CPU would make it large, at least in the current production size. Wonder how many pins?