Webb finds molecule only made by living things in another world::undefined

  • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    it picked up hints of a substance only made by living things — at least, that is, on Earth.

    What other process could theoretically produce it?

    • Dani551@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given the vast differences in atmospheres (or the lack thereof) and their conditions, I wouldn’t be surprised if those were the culprits

      • PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of places on earth where life exists in conditions that seem alien compared to the rest of the planet.

        “life finds a way”.

        • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but that’s not how science works. You need to exhaust all possible explanations before jumping to wild conclusions.

          You don’t say, “What’s that in the sky? A UFO? Must be aliens!” when there are hundreds, of not thousands of possible reasons why an observer is unable to identify an aerial phenomena, and none of them involve aliens from another galaxy sent to visit us.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      if you have methanol, hydrogen sulfide and enough heat along with a specific rock, it will get formed. or probably methane, hydrogen sulfide and UV

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        there are many ways, and what i’m saying it’s likely a massive clickbait

        t. organic chemist, currently working with sulfur compounds

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I would also hesitate to automatically rule anything out. The Fermi paradox exists for a reason, and it makes logical sense that if life can appear in one place, it can (and will) do it again. In a universe as large as ours, it’s basically inevitable that we will eventually discover some form of alien life, even if it’s just single-celled organisms (assume we as a species survive long enough).

          I just wanted to throw my 2 cents in because whenever anything like this comes up, you get a rush of two kinds of people: “omg aliens!” and “omg look at all the idiots who thinks it’s aliens; everyone knows aliens aren’t real”. It frustrates me because the existence of alien life shouldn’t be controversial. If anything, imo, the idea that alien life doesn’t exist should be controversial (the Fermi paradox exists for a reason). Just because we haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. It’s honestly scarier imo if it doesn’t exist due to the implications of it.

          — someone who woulda probably been an astrophysicist if they’d been given a chance earlier in life

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            i said nothing about aliens, all i say is that claim “dimethyl sulfide = definite sign of life” makes it a powerful clickbait, because there are processes that can provide it abiogenically from something similar to earth’s primordial soup

            your assumption seems overly optimistic