• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is pure oil company propaganda. I hate cars with a passion and want a car free society. We will get there but it will take time. But We need to get rid of gas NOW.

    Anyone who spews this kind of filth is literally the enemy.

    • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I really do not think so. Oil propaganda would support cars rather than be against it. I’m quite sure this is directed at the people who think EVs are a full solution.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        EVs are the only solution to getting ourselves out of this mess. We can’t ban all cars in the next few years like we can with all gasoline cars. Building proper public transport takes time, especially when it’s been sabotaged to such a point. We need to transit to a carless society through ev or it’s literally over.

        Propaganda is a slimy business and their current strat is bash EVs and bring up nihilism. Regardless of your intentions, you are being their mouthpiece by posting this.

        • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think we live in very different parts of the world. Where I’m from, it is quite self-evident that we have to transition to EVs, and most people in fact already do. However a lot of people seem to forget that EVs only solve part of the problem and that we have to think further, so from my perspective this comic can basically only be used for good.

          But I do get that this could be used by reactionaries to push back against clean energy in places where such sentiments are common. However, I don’t think that’s a particularly big problem on the Fediverse.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s all true, maybe I’m overthinking it. I like his other work, the punch line just seemed prominently anti ev on this one and I think I’m developing a hair trigger for it. Most are a bit more reticent in my community and I’ve seen all kinds of arguments against EVs, some being they are just as bad for the environment so why bother.

            I do agree it might lead to complacency, especially since most countries seem quite unwilling to tackle any kind of issues related to vehicles.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only solution EVs provide is a pathway for automotive companies to continue to exist. They solve nothing and their existence continues to enable suburban sprawl, lack of public transportation, and the alienation of a car-centric society. You are trash for supporting EVs and you aren’t interested in a better world, one without cars.

          • Pipoca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            EVs have about half the lifecycle emissions as a gas car, given today’s electric grid. Which is better, but not all that much better.

            However: 80% of the US lives in metropolitan and micropolitan areas. 20% of the US is rural. You can build better public transit in cities and small towns, and stop doubling down on building shitty-ass suburban stroads and sprawl. But Farmer Joe is never going to bike 20 miles to the nearest Dollar General. It’s just not practical, and neither is putting a bus stop in front of every farm.

            A car-lite world where Farmer Joe drives an EV to a farmer’s market that 95% of people walked, biked or took a bus to seems way better than either the status quo or a car-free world.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              What did “farmer joe” do before cars I wonder? Plus it’s 100% fine if “farmer joe” still uses fossil fuels for his tractor and to drive into town. That isn’t a problem that is solved by EVs. that isn’t a problem that needs to be solved, and that absolutely isn’t the reason you are bringing up EVs at all.

              • Pipoca@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Before cars, he’d probably have gone into town much less, and would probably have gone by horse.

                that isn’t a problem that needs to be solved,

                Why?

          • jimbo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It must be nice living in a little bubble where you don’t have to think about social and political realities.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ironic talking about me living in a bubble when you are literally in a bubble every time you drive. Hope you are ready when the “social and political realities” make a car-centric society untenable.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        the people who think EVs are a full solution.

        Those people don’t exist. These kinds of arguments are only made to cause disagreement. It’s like car-racism.

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I said it’s LIKE racism, meaning that it has similarities.

            Literally NOBODY thinks that EVs are a “full solution” to environmental damage or climate change or whatever the whataboutism is about this week.

            It’s only beneficial to put this argument forward for two groups: Car manufacturers and oil producters.

            Then why is my neighbour down the street spewing this shit on Facebook daily? He is not a car manufacturer or oil producter.

            No, it’s because he has been lead to believe that the smug EV people are going to take his vehicle away. He has bought the lie and now he’s spreading the arguments that will fragment car owners so that nothing will ever change.

            The entire purpose is to split car users and preserve the status quo.

            This is the fuck cars community. We should hate all cars equally. When I see other posters here repeating the lies from the car and oil industries, I have to point it out.

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      My brother in Christ, you literally have no idea how much stuff is made out of petrochemicals, do you? Try asphalt, industrial solvents, cosmetics, any real lubricant, fertilizers, pesticides, textiles, circuitry, detergents, insulation, PVC, paint, adhesives, roofing material, synthetic rubbers, as well as a ton of pharmaceutical products and food additives. And that’s not even an exhaustive list. Gasoline is a big part of the petrochemical industry, but it’s not the totality of it.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do know how much we use petrochemicals. Gasoline is not a direct synonym for petrochemicals, it’s definition is fuel for combustion engines. None of the products you mentioned are made out of gasoline.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The funny thing is, electric cars help with the tire/brake dust and mined materials issue. Regenerative braking reduces the wear on brakes, and electric motors provide smoother power delivery, which reduces tire wear. As for the mined materials, electric cars generally take more material to make, but they are also easier to recycle, and the batteries themselves are able to be recycled in to even better batteries that they were when brand new.

    • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Afaraf
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      But We need to get rid of gas NOW.

      That’s fine, but electric cars are only moving the gas right now.

    • ira@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m curious why you think ocean microplastics can stick around for a few more decades or centuries

        • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was gonna argue that rolling resistance doesn’t have a large impact on efficiency, but apparently I was wrong

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance

          An example of a very light high-speed passenger train is the N700 Series Shinkansen, which weighs 715 tonnes and carries 1323 passengers, resulting in a per-passenger weight of about half a tonne. This lighter weight per passenger, combined with the lower rolling resistance of steel wheels on steel rail means that an N700 Shinkansen is much more energy efficient than a typical automobile.