Mount to united doesn’t make sense not because mount is a bad player but because he doesn’t fit in their squad. He’s best in a midfield or forward role where his defence impact is pressing a back line. So either the more advanced 8 or a 10 or on a wing with a wingback to defend the wide areas and provide width. At united those roles are taken by Fernandes and rashford and we’ve seen Fernandes is best with a double pivot which I don’t think mount works best in. Weird signing imo, mount would’ve been much better at Liverpool or arsenal.
i agree 100%…Chelsea fans not only were mostly done with him but when we saw he was going to a place he was unlikely to succeed, even better. Had he gone to Liverpool especially he might have cooked. At Arsenal he would have been a better fit than Havertz has been.
Mount to united doesn’t make sense not because mount is a bad player but because he doesn’t fit in their squad. He’s best in a midfield or forward role where his defence impact is pressing a back line. So either the more advanced 8 or a 10 or on a wing with a wingback to defend the wide areas and provide width. At united those roles are taken by Fernandes and rashford and we’ve seen Fernandes is best with a double pivot which I don’t think mount works best in. Weird signing imo, mount would’ve been much better at Liverpool or arsenal.
i agree 100%…Chelsea fans not only were mostly done with him but when we saw he was going to a place he was unlikely to succeed, even better. Had he gone to Liverpool especially he might have cooked. At Arsenal he would have been a better fit than Havertz has been.