The FBI previously refused to hire job applicants if they admitted to hiring sex workers or stealing from an employer — or engaging in acts of bestiality.

[…]

In June, the FBI quietly lowered some of the standards it uses when it conducts background checks on would-be federal agents and other personnel. According to multiple sources briefed on the matter, the FBI did so to facilitate hiring in some cases, even if candidates acknowledged they engaged in sexually deviant activities or stole from an employer.

  • searabbit@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    What’s curious to me is no mention of relaxing it’s standards on drugs. There’s two main reasons real talent doesn’t apply to the federal government regardless of administration: non-competitive pay and no drugs. No drugs also means that you need to disclose any illicit drug use in the past and that might disqualify you. If they’re relaxing their standards on people who hire sex workers (huge honeypot risk), people who steal from employers (obvious compromise risk), and people who have engaged in animal cruelty (sociopaths), but not drugs, they have completely lost the purpose of conducting the background checks.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is pedophilia still a no-no? Seems weird to have higher standards for an FBI grunt than a President.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Seems weird to have higher standards for an FBI grunt than a President.

      Well the standard for President is be a natural born US citizen, 35 or older, and been a resident of the US for 10 years. Beyond that, every standard to be President is entirely decided by the voters.

      Blame the 166.4 Million Americans that looked at Trump and said “yeah, I’m OK with him being President”.