• wanderwisley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why won’t you get the vaccine? “Because idk what’s in it.” Why did you get Chinese dick and hair pills? “Because I NEED it!”

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    My experience with random processes: on large scales, things either happen 0 times or many times. So I find the idea that life exists in only one place pretty implausible.

    • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s the rule for astronomy. If it happens once, it always happens; we just haven’t seen it yet

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        you may define life however you like; the thing I said still makes sense regardless of definition (0 or many)

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Here I googled it for you

        It is defined descriptively by the capacity for homeostasis, organisation, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction.

        If you’re gonna be on lemmy you should really learn basic definitions or at least learn how to look them up. Then you should go back to your high school and burn it down (without anyone inside) because it completely failed you.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          By that definition, the first life on earth was not alive the first 1 billion years or so, until the complex process of reproduction was invented. Heck, life doesn’t even have to be mobile, can be fused to a rock, even more so than moss or a stromatolith. Metabolism and maybe reaction to stimuli are imo the only real requirements.

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    By that logic they saw a god. But I’d ask if they need a starship first. Then that would confirm if they were a god.

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I haven’t met or seen any of you… Man, the bots are really good at shitposting.

  • Uncurable Utopia @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The concept of alien is inside our finite comprehension and logic. That is, if Earth is a habitable planet, and it is habituated, then there are possibilities of other habitable planets. If that so, then It’s science’s job to prove the existence of other habituated planets( eventually alien). But, maintaing this vast universe is believed to be done by an Omnipotent being/entity called God, I guess people developed this way of thinking by their conscience and comprehension. So far, science hasn’t been able to explain many cosmic events, why those happen, how they happen etc. But the melody, the harmony that lies in those events, even science sometimes has to say that those kinds of events can only be happen with the presence of an Omnipotent, conscious entity/being. Science and Religion are a total different thing. One is based on fact and the other is based on faith. Both have different psychological wiring on the mind thus people think differently towards these 2 subjects. Just let it as it be and laugh at this meme. Your faith or fact is unharmed. Don’t worry.🤝🫂

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      “But the melody, the harmony that lies in those events, even science sometimes has to say that those kinds of events can only be happen with the presence of an Omnipotent, conscious entity/being.”

      No. Scientists will collectively say “we don’t know” and continue research and asking questions. Modern scientists don’t chalk it up to God. This isn’t the 1600s.

      • Uncurable Utopia @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not knowing something isn’t the fault of science. Science naturally researches, digs up what it doesn’t know and then proposes an answer/explanation. But it doesn’t mean that it allies with the concept of religion. This loop will end up somewhere like: “If you know something, then you don’t have to believe it anymore. Because… Well, you know it now.” This kind of loophole will circulate around people who try to mesh science and religion together. Science “MIGHT” eventually find the answers behind those unexplainable cosmic events. If science find it, then it’ll be science’s success. But religion comes within faith. People believe something they don’t know the answer of, existence of. They live their life by the commands of the books in hope for what is promised to them in afterlife. That’s it. [ What would happen if religious people came to know about God, heaven and hell, afterlife is just the bottom pit of the loophole. If people knew those things, you can’t be 100% sure that all the ‘religious’ people would live their life according to the commands of their religion to get into heaven. Uncertainty exists both in science and in religion. ]

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          “If people knew those things, you can’t be 100% sure that all the ‘religious’ people would live their life according to the commands of their religion to get into heaven.”

          They already don’t 😂

  • Susurrus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Unsure if relevant, since this is a meme post, but for anyone interested: faith is quite a complex concept. And this silly atheist vs religious conflict is so pointless. It does nothing but elevate some people’s egos and infuriate others.

    Sadly, both sides are heavily uninformed. Most atheists spent at most 3 seconds studying religion, while most religious people never questioned a single thing about their religion. How can you understand somebody and their point of view, if you haven’t even imagined yourself in their shoes, let alone walked in them?

    Short story is: to ‘believe’ in God, or any other religious entity, does not mean ‘to think He exists’. In fact, you can ‘believe’ in any god, while being completely convinced they don’t exist. Fact and faith are fully separate.

    At least some confusion here is intentionally created by religious institutions, like the Catholic Church. Most of what they do goes against the Bible and Jesus’ teachings, but it’s not like they care. Focusing on Christianity here, because that’s what I studied the most (my country is Christian). Same applies to Judaism and Islam. Other religions less, since these three have the biggest, most organized official structures (massive red flag in case it wasn’t obvious).

    Anyway, I invite everyone to read about and learn their so-called enemies’ ways instead of blindly ridiculing them.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’d wager most millenial-and-older atheists probably attended mass regularly as kids. Many are probably baptized, confirmed, had communion, etc.

      We just realized it’s all bullshit intended for social control at some point along the way.

      Same kids who stopped saying the pledge in school as soon as they realized they could.

      Zoomer and younger atheists…yeah, they might have not had that experience. Probably because they were brought up by already-atheist (or at least barely-believing, twice-a-year types) gen-x and older millennials.

      • Susurrus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Completely agree. I had the same experiences as a kid. Organized religious institutions always go against the religions they pretend to preach. Religious belief should be a personal choice, not a mass brain washing.

        The Catholic Church requires that Christians indoctrine their children into Christianity since they are born. But this is the Church speaking, not Christianity or Jesus. In fact, the New Testament clearly says that it is perfectly acceptable for the family of a Christian to reject Christianity. The sole fact that they love the part of their family that is Christian, is enough.

        But of course, barely any self-proclaimed Christians have ever opened the Bible, let alone read it. And the Church coveniently doesn’t recommend reading it.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Funny you should mention that.

          My paternal grandparents were very religious, and my dad attended mass regularly as a kid and went to Catholic school.

          However, I don’t think he’s willingly set foot into a church except for funerals since I was born.

          My grandmother would drag me to church several times a week though.

          Didn’t stop my dad from threatening to baptize my kid behind my back when my first kid was a baby. I think it was said in jest, or maybe to troll me…but my oldest is 8 now and neither of my kids have been around my parents unsupervised. Reap what you sow.

          And the Church coveniently doesn’t recommend reading it.

          That’s their own fault. Should’ve left it in Latin. Or Aramaic.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      First, paragraph breaks. Please use them.

      Second, that isn’t how everyone feels. That is how you feel. People do in fact find it utterly hypocritical to see one thing one way and not the other and then claim to have knowledge above anyone else.

      Third, aliens are more likely than gods. Mathematically speaking.

      • Susurrus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago
        1. Added paragraph breaks and will try to use them actively.

        2. As mentioned in another reply, I was referring to the base idea, and not to what people think or feel. Perhaps I failed to convey that effectively.

        3. Probably true. Hard to say for certain, but as far as I can tell, ‘aliens’ are practically guaranteed to exist, while gods are the opposite.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reading the Bible has made me despise Christianity even more. It’s not the content that upsets me, it’s the brash hypocrisy that Christian Nationalists operate by that upsets me. Too many Christians go directly against Christs teachings. It’s not rocket science either. It’s clear, concise teachings to love your neighbor as thyself… And yet they’ll say oh no that’s taken out of context… Fucking ridiculous. Christ would flip so many Christian tables. That might be what the second coming is tbh. Just flipping these flagrant hypocrites tables.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This makes no sense. Most people when asked about the literal existence of god say they think so. Americans only fell below 50% very recently…again the literal existence of god (the numbers are similar for the Gallup poll on belief in god). You’re drawing a dichotomy that does not exist.

      About half of American adults believe in the actual existence of a spiritual patriarchy and here you are trying to claim belief!=belief in existence. Unless you have something to back it up, I’m calling bs.

      • Susurrus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        What you’re saying is completely true, but in no way contradicts what I said. I was referring to the fundamental idea of faith. I never said people adhere to it, and that nobody actually thinks God, or whatever else, exists.

        Obviously, a lot of people do. Just like a lot of people think the Earth is flat or that chocolate milk comes from chocolate cows. A huge number of people are uneducated, have been fed propaganda and manipulated for years. I don’t think anyone needs any convincing that churches lie to and scam people on a daily basis for personal gain. But doesn’t make faith or religion itself a lie.

        Similarly, there’s quite a few self improvement gurus who make up false ideas about self improvement and feed lies to their many, many followers. But does that make self improvement itself a lie, or a pointless dream?

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          “I don’t think anyone needs any convincing that churches lie to and scam people on a daily basis for personal gain.”

          And yet televangelists exist. Megachurches exist. Churches have been scamming Christs sheep for millennia all for them to be none the wiser.

          • easily3667@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m still somewhat confused about the distinction they are drawing, but it seems to be that yes we who are not morons can acknowledge scammers exist in a given field while not completely ignoring the value of that field.

            Where it gets dicey for me is that from my pov the vast majority of religious “leaders” and self help people are scammers, and most people who are doing actually good work in these areas are not exactly prominent. “Do good works” doesn’t make money. “Treat yourself well” doesn’t make money. Because these people work within capitalism, they require a constant revenue stream and the positive aspects of these areas don’t provide that revenue stream.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          So you refer with

          Short story is: to ‘believe’ in God, or any other religious entity, does not mean ‘to think He exists’. In fact, you can ‘believe’ in any god, while being completely convinced they don’t exist. Fact and faith are fully separate.

          to the church vs. belief thing?

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t need to analyze religion to know that 9000 gods on this earth means not a single one of them is right and that single one of them is just a money scam, no further deep thinking needed, magical thinking, fuck that

      • Susurrus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Deep thinking is never needed. Animals manage their entire lives just fine without it!

  • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Iamverysmart atheists understanding the nuances of religion and faith being an inherently irrational yet human response to existential dread challenge (impossible)

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The post is actually by a theist that believes in aliens, and wants others to do so too

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      human response to existential dread

      I realize this was likely not intended, but you’ve ironically removed most of the nuance in why religions came to exist in this statement lol.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah like that’s exactly what the folks I know think. There’s nothing, and it sucks, but we don’t need religion as copium.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      So…to be clear you think we don’t know religion is an irrational response to existential dread? Cause…I have a bridge to sell you.

  • entwine413@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s really stupid to not believe in aliens given the size of the universe.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The Orvil did a episode on that where they found a two dimensional universe with life in it. The bad part, three dimensional life cannot exist in two dimensions with a digestive track, it gets split into two parts.

          I can’t imagine a forth, fifth, or sixth dimension or how a three dimensional being could survive it.

    • s_s@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Earth First” is an interesting and compelling explanation for the Fermi Paradox.

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I also agree with this statement, although it’s well within the realm of possibility that life on Earth was seeded by an ancient extraterrestrial civilization. That’s a timescale of a few billion years.

        But it’s still not as stupid as thinking that the supreme creator of the infinite universe has a personal interest in how you live your life.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          That would make some sense if not for overwhelming proof of evolution of both, animals and nature that started out with pretty much nothing

          • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            I like to entertain the idea that something similar to mushroom spores were emitted throughout a part of space and mostly didn’t work but, where it did, life was ready to ride evolution all over again from just the basics. Just fun to think about. I’m not a witch, don’t burn me

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        7 days ago

        What about the American people constantly complaining about aliens illegally entering their country? Explain this!

      • dgbbad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        We are the evidence. Life can happen. It’s been proven. If it’s happening here, it’s crazy to think we are somehow special and it’s not happening somewhere else out there.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        alien doesn’t necessarily mean sapient, humanoid or even anything larger than a walnut. if you took life on earth as a sample of the universe it would be much more likely for an alien lifeform to be a plant or bacteria. and even an animal is more likely to be an insect than a mammal-like animal, much less anything humanoid.

        (someone should look into the numbers my source is just vague memory at this point)

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also given the scale of time of the universe. We as humans have only existed for a small amout of time on the vast scale of things.

      Countless alien civilizations may have existed and destroyed themselves, and may others may have not come into existence yet.

    • capybara@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      People who are interested in aliens and UFOs rarely solely make this argument. Often, they’ve encountered or somehow know of these aliens.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s a bit of an oxymorinic argument those people use. If an inteligent species dropped by and had ONE look around, they would NOT turn on their high beams.

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          If an intelligent species was able to travel the distance to actually reach us that’d mean they are far far far far beyond our technological capacity. It’d be game over if aliens ever reached us.

  • cuuube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I swear this post is straight from 9gag. It feels like it was made 15 years ago…