• M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, you did hire goons, but you wanted gooners… And who is that to right one supposed to be? How is a maffia boss some dude with what looks like an assassin cloak with “Evil” written on it?

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    I miss when gay means happy.

    Okay I’m not that old but i had a boss who said he’s old enough to remember when gay literally means happy.

    For me, my little pet peeve is when society changed the meaning of ironic to mean joking or satirical.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “Gimme the good old days when a pair of boobs were a couple of dumb guys.” - Sheriff Buford T. Justice

    Edited to fix attribution. I was sure it was Dangerfield, but DDG says otherwise.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Goon literally started out as the big nosed henchmen of the sea hag in the Popeye comic strip in the 1930s. It got applied to refer to anti-union fighters very quickly before it became a general purpose word meaning low-level henchman.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    People keep on using “glaze” to mean to excessively praise somebody, but I’m pretty sure it means to give a wet sloppy blowjob, so it’s pretty weird hearing it used otherwise.

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No glazing is what you do to their face after they’ve given you a wet sloppy blowjob. Thats where it gets its more conversational definition of showing excessive praise to someone.

    • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, and flexing… At least in my language they try to use it as “showing off”… Well, kinda, I guess it can be showing off to show much can fit up your ass.

  • DEJED@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do you all remember the movie “The Goonies”? Yeah… so many levels of wrong with this new definition when applied to that movie

          • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            What’s funny about revenge of the nerds is that no one on set, even the girls, thought anything of that plot point at all at the time. It wasn’t until the 2010s that the backlash against it for that scene became a major sticking point.

            Not to say it was ever acceptable to impersonate someone else to have sex with a girl. That is rape by deception, but movies did have different standards at the time. For example a lot of movies had scenes were children were put in fairly awkward situations that would be scandalous today but at that time the whole ‘children pretending to be adults’ wasn’t seen as a big deal.

            The nostalgia critic in his review of The Chipmunks movie (the 80s one) did bring up that point to explain the mentality behind those scenes at the time.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            There are old reviews calling that scene out when the movie was new.

            edit: I’m looking for the review, but there’s so many modern reviews, that finding a scanned new paper article from 1984 is difficult.

            Another example of people knowing Revenge of the Nerds ain’t right was Real Genius. The creative crew was hired by the studio to make their own Revenge of the Nerds, but they hated that movie and made a fixed version.

            There’s some interview with the director of Revenge of the Nerds who defended the rapist as a “complex character.” Utter nonsense. The real concern with all this how obviously fine Hollywood was and still is with rape. What they considered normal seeped into the media they produced and normalized it to the masses watching it.

            On Goonies, the name is fine and isn’t problematic. I saw Inside Job take a swipe at it for how they treated Sloth, but he was sympathetic and his abusers were his family, the villains. The two things that don’t age too well the was the Japanese People Love Gadgets, which considering it was only the one kid and his father, isn’t that bad. It’s pretty reasonable for a son to have the same hobby as his father and tech otakus are a thing. The second is the body shaming the Chunk character, which when recording the scene, made the director so uncomfortable, he paid for a gym membership for the kid. There’s a lot worse movies from the 80s to watch.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    And there was a time that gay meant happy and a removed was a piece of fire wood. Though the Brits, in their usual word butchery, turned that into fag for cigarette.

    Languages change and morph. They are living things. And despite the French’s best effort to try and prevent it.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Did you self-censor? It says “removed” in italics. I don’t know what a piece of fire wood could be called to be so offensive to self-censor

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      We used it to mean cigarette before yanks turned it into a slur. You’re the butchers here!

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You butchered your own word removed to get fag. And who eats veg? And soccer that the US gets blamed for. We got it from you! Mangling words is what Brits do because they are orally lazy!

        *****For those without a sense of humor, this is meant in fun.

        • Lennny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          So lazy and yet wanting to be respected. Oh we don’t eat cows. That’s for the poors, we eat beef.

          Bunch of fuckin tea sippin wankers. But for the brits sake, words ending in re instead of er does look better to me. Theatre over theater. Colour is more colorful of a spelling…

          Regarding the gays, didn’t they use to burn gay people which is why the term connected from bundle of sticks to gay people? And probably why we use flamer as well, now that I think about it.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            We raise cows. We eat beef even if we are poor, we don’t discriminate. Well, up until the prices these days. It’s going back to being a rich person’s supper. Much to the joy of Vegans. But even cow is better than beouf or it’s variations.

            re vs. er? bloody silent letters again. Colour looks like a wannabe upjump word. And there is the whole silent letter thing again.

            Those crude heathens probably hanged them the majority of the time vs burn. Wood costs money and takes time. A rope is cheap and faster plus it’s reusable and fits their attitude.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      makes languages sound kinda gay, all that morphing and changing.

      next you’ll be telling me they have formal versions and informal versions too