The US president has already paid the writer over $5m in damages in the assault and defamation case.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    ok, but this is still a weird concept that seems to stretch defamation law beyond what it’s intended for: A claims something negative (X) about B, B says “that is not true”, A then sues B because it’s a defamatory claim that A is lying about X? Do constellations like that happen a lot?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was because it was knowingly false and caused harm to her reputation. That’s the definition of defamation.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      You can counter sue for whatever you want, but it’s a losing argument if there is already a judgment against you for the X being decided by a jury or judge on the merits.