FWIW, what might have been but probably never really, etc.

  • SiliconAvatar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The Klingons were always stand-ins for the Russians

    In 1967, perhaps. The movie versions sort of took a step back from 1:1 interpretations. If anything, the Romulans are a better simile to the (Cold war/Soviet) Russians from a Western standpoint.

    Echoing today, there was an unstable element in the Empire

    Really, you look at contemporary Russia, and you think dissidents are the most obvious issue? Not oligarchy, state disinformation and war mongering?

    TL;DR — don’t let Matalas anywhere near your favourite franchise.

    • billmason@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Not oligarchy, state disinformation and war mongering?

      My main reaction overall to the reveal was this iteration of Paramount ownership would have cancelled something that delved into these things as fast as it did the rest of the Trek slate.

      Also, it’s slightly boggling that the fans who wanted this were hyped for Captain Seven (I think it’s fair to say), and the premise was going to be…nah, let’s do a Worf/Alexander/Klingon politics story? Who was asking for more Alexander stories?