• Faux@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Typical lib-left. Sees the problems (but not the bigger picture), insists on non-solutions.

    However, we also need to be honest about certain use cases that might no longer be welcome on Codeberg. If you see yourself on this list, you don’t need to move right away, but there might be other places that better fit your needs:

    • Projects that are created by LLM “agents” in autonomous ways
    • Projects written and maintained with heavy use of LLMs
    • Projects where the amount of resources (e.g. storage, CI/CD) is significantly larger than what the involved amount of people could have created by hand
    • Projects heavily tied to the LLM ecosytem, e.g. LLM-written tools to ease LLM usage
    • Users sending LLM contributions in violation of project’s custom policies

    You can check the specific change added to the Terms of Use.

    These tools are going to stay, insisting on not using them while fascists do is not going to help us.

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s somewhat fair in that it doesn’t outright allow LLM assistance. Besides it is the first policy of its kind and will probably be refined further depending on how things turn out.