The seller in question was selling items they didn’t have at a nearly 50% markup.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    The seller just buys the item on Amazon and sends it to your address usually at an inflated price. They sell stock that they don’t own.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      23 hours ago

      To play the role of the annoying five year old, “And why is that bad?”

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Can’t people just buy directly then, why do they choose to use these dropshippers?

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              But if you compare prices, why wouldn’t you go for the lower price?

              If you don’t compare prices, well, at that point it’s just on you tbh.

              • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It’s usually over different websites and look like different levels of quality. For example, my friend bought a part of their Halloween costume on etsy, expecting something of decent hand made quality. Instead he got something mass produced from a factory drop shipped from Amazon.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That’s how modern business operates. Market t is statured and the market aint got a lot of new ways to make money so these “entrepreneurs” just trying to middle man everything 69 times

          Best example is any e commmer transactions, so you regular buyer and seller but now you also got amazon, bank, visa, some advertising algo that sells your data…

          Jfc I am just trying to buy a pair of fucking socks.

      • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They’re taking your money without providing you any value. It’s dishonest and it’s against eBay’s terms of service (unless they are working directly with the supplier, which I highly doubt is the case.)

        • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          41
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It says that a refund is offered and you can still keep it. I see absolutely nothing negative for you. But the answer from another user makes 100% sense. That for later scams as soon as a positive reputation has been built up.

            • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              If you just want to get it wrong. In the message itself on the picture there is nothing negative about what OP said with no money back. The answer of another user has explained how the scam is what makes 100% sense. Which also makes it obvious that it serves as an owner bribe. OP just didn’t point that out.

              The negative rating and reporting is also correct. I didn’t say anything against that either.

              • Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Yes, from the individual person that is a perfect deal, nothing monetary to lose but they can get something. Only other persons will suffer. Which is exactly why everyone here calls it a bribe. Which is why you saying that completely neutral makes it look as if you think that is good and should be done.

                What exactly are you arguing for or against at this point?

                • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  This was a great answer with an explanation. https://lemm.ee/comment/18878997

                  I’m just saying that his text doesn’t explain that others will be scammed later. The fact that he then writes no money back while in the text on the picture exactly that is offered does not make the actual fraud any more obvious. With the explanation it makes sense that it is used as a bribe but without the explanation it is not so obvious.

                  Of course, I do not condone fraud and welcome any action against it.

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            23 hours ago

            The point of it is that by exposing them they will have to create a new account to scam with.

            • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              Lol Did I say anything against it? No. Did I suggest that the answer from another user makes more sense? Namely exactly what you are now also referring to, that it will be used for future scams. I didn’t say anything against rating the seller badly because it is the right thing to do. That you should definitely report them.

              I have not objected to anything. Only that it was said that there is no money back if the picture in the message clearly states that he can keep the item and have his money back. In the message is nothing negative for the OP itself.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s a way of farming sales and reputation, to build an account for later scamming with.

        A brand new account running a scam gets picked up almost immediately as they’re watched closer. An account that’s been around for 5 years, selling products without reports of fraud, suddenly switching to scams stays under the radar longer.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You should suspect it for items with really long delays. They are waiting for a sale or new pricing. They sold you something they don’t have and don’t plan to send until they find it cheaply enough to hit their profit target.

        Meanwhile you could have bought from someone who actually has it, direct from the original seller without extra markup, or waited for the same sale they are

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A deliberately deceptive business practice that does nothing to help consumers and only raises prices? If you have to have it explained to you why that is bad, well I’m sorry, but you are beyond saving.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Why is doing literally nothing but adding cost a bad thing? 🤷‍♂️ they’re even selling on the same platform, it makes the actual-priced product harder to find or is just a full-on scam, pretending they sell higher quality products than actuality.

      • Mokopa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The complexity of returns wouldn’t be ideal I guess, you don’t have the original receipt etc.