Too many products are easier to throw away than fix—consumers deserve a ‘right to repair’::There was a time when the family washing machine would last decades, with each breakdown fixed by the friendly local repair person. But those days are long gone.

  • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know what needs to be added to this? Cars. The amount of body damage needed to “total” most cars is almost trivial these days.

    • markussim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be fair, cars are designed to break in a car crash for safety. If it breaks it can absorb the impact a lot better and therefore make the crash more survivable.

      • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, in this case it’s an acceptable tradeoff. I’d rather lose my car than my life.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But what about Rule of Acquisition #23: “Nothing is more important than your health… except for your money,”?

          • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I prefer Rule of Acquisition #240: “Time, like latinum, is a highly limited commodity.”

      • Toadiwithaneye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        The body and the chassis are really the only parts that need to be built for the sake of breaking for safety. The other parts on the car do not need to be disposable, but for the most they are. The part placement and design are not engineered with repair in mind.

          • Toadiwithaneye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s not what I said, I said those were the parts of the car that really need to be crafted to break for safety. Your interior, electronics, your transmission, engine, etc. Can be designed with repair in mind like older cars. Most new cars are a pain to repair and not because they need to be.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cars are themselves a symptom of a broken system designed to maximize waste. It’s wrong that the majority of people even need one to begin with.

    • SGG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Definitely want to see cars (and other larger purchases) more able to be repaired in future. However, especially in cases of an accident there’s other factors.

      Part of it as already mentioned is a safety thing. Crumple zones and the like are there to purposefully deform so that the people inside the vehicle have a higher chance of surviving a crash.

      Part of it is that being hit in the wrong way can also weaken the structural integrity of the frame making it unsafe to use. Makes more sense to strip it for parts at that point. Last thing a repair or insurance company wants is to be found liable for saying “yes the car is repairable/safe to drive”, then the front falls of on a highway.

      Part of it also is that insurance companies won’t want to pay for repairs that amount to more than the cost of replacing the entire car if it’s older. Or they know they can make more money by paying out a policy then repairing and refurbishing the vehicle.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Can’t you just tow it outside the environment to avoid liability if the front falls off?

    • smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      When I buy a vehicle, I touch it, if it’s solid metal hey awesome, if it’s plastic or fiber whatever I just nope out because I’ve seen what happens when they’re in the smallest of accident.

      I can pull a ding out of metal, or even just stop by pull apart and pop a replacement door or whatever off something similar. Can’t do that when half the frame shatters in impact, might as well buy another car which is exactly what they want us to do

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I disagree. Our planet doesn’t give a shit. It was long before us here and it will remain even longer after last one of us. Our living environment on the other hand is suffering. I know this is semantics we are talking about, but it does point just how stupid we are. It’s tantamount to shitting under your own window and wondering why everything stinks.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Part of the reason why our environment is suffering is that it takes a lot more energy (which causes pollution) and raw materials (which also take energy and cause pollution) to make and ship a new thing than it does to fix the one you have. Sure it’s not a huge percentage overall, but imagine if every thing you had suddenly lasted 3 or 4 times longer. The sheer amount of new things you had to buy would drop substantially, along with all that’s required to produce and sell them to you.

        • smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I feel like it would make a huge difference. They’re planning obsolescence for vehicles and equipment now too. I have a tractor from the 70’s that’s still running fine, why? Because they used to make them with the idea that the consumer can and should be able to perform their own maintenance and repair, for a farmer back then a tractor was a huge purchase and was expected to last many years. I

          Meanwhile, the new ones require being brought to the shop for all kinds of things, many can only be fixed with software that most people don’t have, if available at all.

          Instead of repairing what they have, companies want people to just buy new stuff every couple of years if not sooner.

          It’s just sad when stuff from 50 years ago will still last longer than something you purchase today.

          Regarding automotives and equipment, old machinery could last forever really, with the right replacement parts, but those are getting extremely hard to find as well with everyone just buying new instead of repairing what they have. It’s something else…

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m all about right to repair. But why is it so hard to find places to dispose of e waste clearly labeled do not throw away in trash? We can’t even trash correctly.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Literally costs more to buy secondhand than buy brand new.

    I have to fight every time to repair or buy used because I can go to shops and get the product cheaper.

    Most second hand comes with shipping on top as well.

    It’s infuriating.

    There is already enough stuff in existence. Stop cutting down trees to make more wooden products. We have them. They just go to dump instead.

    • smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Exactly, and tbh if we stopped making vehicles today people would still be driving many years from now, feel like we should really… stop mining the earth for resources to then use making things people don’t even need so we can be richer… just make vehicles repairable again and focus on that.

      Maybe, instead of everyone buying brand new cars we can just upgrade our old ones, like a PC.

      So you want the latest Dodge body to look cool? Okay, we’ll just pop that onto you’re already existing frame, no need in buying a new engine/chassis etc if you’re only seeking an aesthetic change anyway

      Speaking of that… all this $ people pay for faster cars when they’ll only really drive them between 30-70mph is ridiculous. Why even make commercial cars faster than the speed limit? Just so dummies can drive drunk at 120mph and hit a family head on? Until we get an Autobahn there’s just no need for it.

      No need for 16 year olds, anyone really to have a V8 with 900 horsepower just give them something that will go the speed limit and save the fucking resources

      • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Agree. Everything should be upgradedable.

        I don’t need a new phone. I need new batteries and new motherboard or soc.

        Houses are upgraded. Cars and everything should be too

        • smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly. Not sure why cars are the exception other than profit

          Though in retrospect I do retract, or admit maybe my view on only allowing cars that go to 70 mph is flawed, can’t hate on people that want fast cars, it’s up to them if they want to upgrade and have something nice, I do too, but it is definitely excessive

    • Corroded@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are a lot of handheld emulators out there (you can check out SBC Gaming communities if you want examples) and they quickly become moderately outdated but because they are relatively inexpensive they are difficult to sell/buy used.

      You are typically only looking at a maybe $10 return with how things end up.


      This is just the first example that came to mind when I read your comment

  • Borkingheck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    The first thing to go on a washing machine is usually the bearings. Most washing machines now have their bearings attached to the drum, so to replace the bearing, the whole drum has to be replaced. Replacing the drum is near the entire cost of a new washing machine and you will likely have to pay for 0.5 to .75 days worth of labour to have the old drum replaced too.

    Yeah fuck these shinty designs to force consumers into buying and dumping otherwise easily repairable and reusable machines.

    • smackmyballsoff@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe not with smart devices, but the automotive industry is headed the same way. I can repair a truck from the 70’s and keep it running forever with the right parts, and even with some not-so right ones.

      Nowadays for example, a tractor or truck from 2020 can’t be repaired like that, they’re installing systems that we-the user and even our mechanics can’t access so you absolutely HAVE to take it back to them for repair. That’s just wrong, these trucks have absolutely no need for software like this, it’s only purpose is to prevent people from repairing things they’ve already paid for.

    • Sirsnuffles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Software shouldn’t be locked.

      The manufacturer should stand by their products.

      Products don’t need constant updates.

      There is a point to repair.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I cannot believe a law like this has to exist. It’s telling just how out of control and unchecked capitalism is.

  • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the main problem. Make more parts, less full devices. And we also will throw less out.

    We need to be more efficient with what we make across every industry, do that and we may be able to save this world.

    • Flambo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We need to be more efficient with what we make

      We need to make stuff with the goal of not having to make any more of it at some point. Currently we have an economy that gives no shits about what is made so long as it sells more this quarter than last.

      Either we need a magical wave of enlightenment to change the priorities of those who control the means of production, or we need to change the structure of our economy and its incentives to make “build to last” a winning strategy.

      • Corroded@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m hoping there’s a large wave of consumer “hacks” for aging devices like people retrofitting old Thinkpads with new batteries and motherboards.

        I feel like it could be a push in the right direction for manufacturers

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We need to be more efficient with what we make across every industry

      The current situation is the result of seeking efficiencies in a market in which consumers demanded that they did not want to fix things.