• stankmut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          That depends on if what the article says about them bothers you. The top comment is kinda misleading by just listing all the name of companies mentioned without putting why they were mentioned. Kape isn’t on the list for lying about privacy, they are on the list for owning 4 VPN companies.

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There’s a reason why most of their advertising is about protecting yourself from the privy eyes of the advertisers, and going around content locking, and not actual privacy.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Still been using windscribe for the past few years. Still haven’t had or seen any issues. It’s pretty cheap and works great.

  • lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It markets itself to journalists, activists, and people in countries where being monitored by a government is a real risk. Its CIO had signed a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ over his role in building surveillance infrastructure for a government targeting those same categories of people.

    At least this one I can understand, the guy probably knows pretty well what to protect from, and also may have changed the opinion on if you should attack journalists or protect them

    That would’ve been better disclosed at hiring time, not when someone found out, of course