- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25221878
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25218430
Quick vid summarizing it all for those who do not have time to read through
I can’t say I’m particularly outraged by any of the proposed legislative changes, but I feel like there’s some reading between the lines that would need to be done.
Like their transportation memo embraces new and innovative technology, while ignoring the innovation and efficiency that can be gained by leveraging existing technology. Canada’s train legislation is in dire need of reform.
If they centralize control of transport policy in the federal government, but then declare the needs of suburbs take priority over the needs of cities, then we could end up with a Doug Ford in charge who works to eradicate cycling infrastructure nationwide, and turn cities into mere corridors for cars to pass through to other destinations.
This is what I gathered too. The standard tactic of distracting the government and the public from known good solutions, to spend money on something else instead which happens benefit them. Example - Hyperloop as a distraction from high speed rail.
Either way, I wouldn’t expect for-profit tech CEOs who aren’t experts in public services like transportation or health to propose reforms that put the public’s benefit first. I’d expect that from a city planner, a Metrolinx person, a university expert, some other public servant, or adjacent.