I switched from Gmail to Proton, but now with everything coming out about Proton I’m switching from them too. I started using Posteo which I like but a lot of my accounts having to do with money and finance (including my bank) aren’t accepting the Posteo email. They have rejected it over and over and even locked me out stating that I was hacked.

Do you guys have any recommendations for email providers to use that also won’t send red flags to my more official accounts?

If it helps, I’m US-based.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Serious starting to wonder if all this vague, anti-Proton misinformation-posting isn’t just some Google-backed astroturfing campaign

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m also in the US and using Posteo. I’ve never had any issues (that I recall) with the address being rejected. Have you tried using a Posteo-provided alias with a different domain?

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Consider getting your own domain name and pointing it at a provider, then when they enshittify you just switch provider and don’t have to change all your emails everywhere again.

    • wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is how I use Proton. The setup process is really easy with clear instructions on what to configure in your DNS provider.
      The only problem I have is that gmail rejects emails from my domain, I have to use proton’s address.

      • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        You need to build up reputation before you can beat spam filters. This happens all the time to new domains. Make sure to have Dmarc and Dkim configured.

        • wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Yes, but normally I don’t send a lot of emails anyway.

          If I send to any @gmail.com address, it’s rejected, unless I change the From to my @proton.me

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well proven strategy, to the point where most providers explicitly allow it (might even be a decider). But don’t trust me (genuinely), Moar research! (please)).

      • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        BRILLIANT

        Well… it has advantages, for sure. Also drawbacks. A custom domain, that ties together all your separate email addresses.

        There are let’s say 16 addresses on mysuperbestnumberonemail dot com. One used at a bank, one on a shopping site, 4 on a social media site, and one each at some utilities. Those are the ONLY uses of that domain for email in the whole world.

        Where if it’s a domain millions of others use, then addresses are harder to pinpoint down to one person.

        That might matter to someone. Or it might not. Depends on what you care about. Just something to be aware of. A custom domain is a huge fingerprinting signal.

        • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would advise mainly using a generic {hello,mail,<domain>}@domain.tld as that reduces the bits of information that can be gained about its use®, and consider WHOIS data. Most registrars hide that information from the public but it’s still subject to court orders - always check what legislation a given TLD falls under. There are also some registrars that are fully anonymous.

  • Autonomous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    What trust are you expecting to get out of an ancient and inherently insecure protol to begin with?

    • Geodes & Gems@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think they sponsored a right-wing French Youtuber, but they publicly apologised and said they didn’t know his political alignment.

    • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same. No idea what OP is talking about and I’m usually up to speed on stuff. Nobody has answered either so it’s probably an old article from a couple months ago about that cia inquiry or whatever (can’t recall). Idk what else. They always have a bad rep here, but it’s better than pretty much everything else, minus maybe a few one-offs.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There is absolutely no evidence for it. He went to lobby in DC, and apparently, some GOP folks had time for him but Dems didn’t. Could have been the opposite on different day based on several factors.

        Then recently, the marketing firm they hired put a sponsorship on a far right guy’s video. They accepted full accountability for the mistake and said they would change procedures to get those being sponsored vetted appropriately.

        Neither one of these are evidence of being MAGA. You can personally lobby in DC and find an individual of an opposite party who might have interest in your message. Just because Grainger played a commercial during satanic music videos doesn’t mean they are Dimmu Borgir fans. It just means people who listen to metal need tools too.

        They guy might be a fascist dick for all I know. I’m just saying that the situations above do not indicate that it is the case. In fact, fascists typically never admit fault or accept accountability for anything. The only concern for me is that he was lobbying in the US at all, but that is the only way you can get your case heard sometimes if you need politicians to hear a different side of an argument.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Proton’s a good alternative.
    There’s some confused allegations of them being MAGA Facists. But it’s a combination of misunderstanding and misrepresentation.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s some confused allegations of them being MAGA Facists. But it’s a combination of misunderstanding and misrepresentation.

      funny how they’re the only ones in this space that keeps making this mistake

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is it funny?
        By a sizeable margin they’re the largest and most popular in the space. At the same time, that makes them the biggest target and most watched.

        Someone even mentioned a possible smear campaign by Google. While there’s no evidence at all of that, they would be the most obvious target.

        So it’s not really funny or odd in any way. It’s kind of obvious really.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          tuta seems to avoid making this “mistake” and it too has a sizeable following as well as a full complement of privacy respecting services that can rival proton.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            They realy aren’t, and don’t.
            Tuta doesn’t have even half the user base, or services.

            They aren’t bad at all. And I don’t doubt they’ll get there.
            But they aren’t at all close yet.

  • veguraineum@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tuta is awesome. You can try their free tier for an unlimited time, so no need to rush it.

    • nefarioushoneybee@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ive been really considering Tuta as my next choice. Do you find it difficult or easy to use for your accounts like bills/finance/important?

      • veguraineum@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        For me it works almost perfect. Once an alias with the @tuta.io Domain got denied, elsewise I am happy. Might depend on the TLD you choose.

      • silmarine@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I used tuta for a long time ans never had any issues. I recently switched only because I wanted to be able to send emails from my self hosted services ans they don’t support anything but they’re own clients. If that’s not a problem for you the tuta is a great option.

    • terradragon@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve also used Tuta. Just gonna point out that some shopping sites didn’t accept my Tuta email. I haven’t used it with financial stuff tho so can’t comment on that.

  • potate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d love input on this too. I went all in on Proton and it’s aging like milk.

    • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Mailbox.org lets you keep your own private key.

      Every email provider lets you keep your own private key if you do encryption using the interoperable OpenPGP standard using software running on your own computer. Many email providers will recommend that you do exactly that, and will helpfully instruct you about how to do so (eg, the more reputable options in this thread such as migadu.com, mailbox.org, posteo.de, and even fastmail.com all have instructions for how to use some implementation of pgp to encrypt your email).

      Meanwhile any company selling non-standard “email encryption” (eg, proton and tuta) which is not compatible with pgp (or, in the corporate world, s/mime, which is also a standard…) is firmly in the snake oil business and should be distrusted and boycotted regardless of which shitty youtubers they’re sponsoring this week.