Norway's electric vehicle sales have increased from less than 1% of total auto sales in 2010 to a whopping 88.9% last year.

Summary

Norway is on track to become the first country to eliminate gasoline and diesel cars from new car sales, with EVs making up over 96% of recent purchases.

Decades of incentives, including tax breaks and infrastructure investments, have driven this shift.

Officials see EV adoption as a “new normal” and aim for electric city buses by 2025.

While other countries lag behind, Norway’s success demonstrates the potential for widespread EV adoption.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    22 hours ago

    I’ve read through your all of your arguments on this thread and it looks like you’re reading lots of papers, looking at a particular finding under specific circumstances, then using that as a blanket answer as to why EVs aren’t viable. The problem is that these are mostly devoid of real world usage of EVs where viability is ultimately determined. Here’s one example:

    Also it’s not a 20% loss at 0°C. It’s closer to 50%. Which would be most accurately described as a “significant” loss of efficiency.

    If an EV driver is only using a fraction of their range to accomplish 100% of their driving needs, then the temporary reduction in battery capacity is completely irrelevant. I can’t say I know any EV drivers that have a 80 mile commute and only buy an EV capable of driving 80 miles under perfect conditions. Would that person exist, you’d have a valid point, but I would guess that person would be a statistical anomaly and shouldn’t be used to derive policy or guidance for the majority of people. Most EV drivers are driving EVs with 200+ mile range and only using a small fraction of that for daily usage, so even with the most extreme temporary reductions its little to no impact on their driving ability.

    In another post you called out that EV batteries use Cobalt which is typically derived from questionable human rights locations. Again, true on paper, but not all EVs use NMC or NCA chemistries which use Cobalt. Many EVs today use LFP and many in the years ahead will be Sodium based, neither of which use Cobalt at all in the batteries. So again, you found one particular finding and applied it to all EVs.

    Any arguments you have about how dirty the extraction and transport methods used for EV materials fall apart immediately when the alternative is petroleum exploration, extraction, refinement, and distribution which need to occurr on an ongoing basis to keep fueling ICE vehicles.

    I don’t think anyone is claiming EVs are completely perfect from a user experience or environmental impact, however, compared to the alternative of ICE vehicles and the ongoing environmental and geopolitical impacts of the needed petroleum extraction needed to continue their use, EVs are a dream come true.

    • tyler@programming.devEnglish
      2·
      12 hours ago

      they’re also completely ignoring the ongoing (environmental) costs of operating a gas vehicle compared to an EV. Even if initial costs might be higher, they are almost immediately paid off, sometimes as soon as six months of driving.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        1 hour ago

        They’re also ignoring Cobalt, Lithium and other valuable battery cathode materials are recovered from recycling NMC and NCA chemistry batteries at something like 90% to 98% efficiency, so not even all Cobalt going into a new battery is absolutely sourced with human rights concerns.