Supporting the AfD party, an openly neo-nazi party, and appearing in their events, days after the “roman salute” removed any kind of ambiguity that could exist. He’s a nazi, period. And the only good nazis are dead nazis.

They, that is the tesla salute. When you see someone with a new tesla you ask if you are doing it right.

Autoparts

I mean that’s certainly outrageous

But it also certainly tells me he’s a nazi

Absolutely he is a nazi

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/fb0aab42-450c-4b89-85b0-592ea842b13e.gif

That’s the most telling bit about his state of mind that day.

If you did a gesture on national TV that lots of people misinterpret as a nazi salute, and you didn’t mean to do a nazi salute, what would you do? What would any person with a public platform in that situation immediately do?

Don’t give him ideas

I mean I guess this might be conspiracy territory (although at this point I feel he’s pretty much completely admitted as much through his whole “I am become meme” cringe persona) but I feel like it’s pretty clear he knew exactly what he was doing at the inauguration and just did it as a “lol watch what edgy thing I’m gonna do… and they won’t do a thing about it” and he was 8 billion percent right. Nobody did a damn thing.

His 2 back to back hitler salutes.

Many people read his leaked 4Chan comments saying how great hitler was

Whoody wat now??? I feel like this needs to be more publicized, like posted everywhere right alongside his little saluting stunt.

Yeah, Nazi is too 1930’s. Technofascist, that’s what Elon Musk is.

He behaves like a Nazi so he’s a Nazi. And clearly calling him that is getting under his skin, so it’s working. I don’t think using a different word will have the same effect. Heck, he might even latch onto neo-feudalist thinking it’s cool or something.

I would like his heart to be cold and stilled.

No, no, he’s not a Nazi because he’s not from the Champagne wine region in France. He’s a Sparkling Authoritarian.

damn, even the timing is accurate… it is like he has been practising since young.

Also remember, every accusation from these people is an admission.

He even publicly called the AFD “centrist”

Calling the press propaganda was.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lying_press

“Lying press” (German: Lügenpresse, lit. ‘press of lies’ [ˈlyːɡn̩ˌpʁɛsə] ⓘ) is a pejorative and disparaging political epithet used largely for the printed press and the mass media at large.

The Nazis adopted the term for their propaganda against the Jewish, communist, and later the foreign press. In 1922 Adolf Hitler used the accusation of the “lying press” for the Marxist press.[citation needed] In the Mein Kampf chapter on war propaganda, he described what he saw as the extraordinary effect of enemy propaganda in the First World War. He criticized German propaganda as ineffective and called for ‘better’ propaganda, which, allegedly like that of the English, French or Americans, was to be oriented towards psychological effectiveness.[6] Accusations of “lying” against domestic journalism can be found in his speeches, for example against the “social democratic press”, Jewish liberals, etc.

Hermann Göring used the expression on 23 March 1933 in his speech during the debate on the Enabling Act of 1933 in the Reichstag.[8] In the same speech he denied attacks on Jewish shops and desecrations of synagogues and Jewish cemeteries.

In December 1937, Manfred Pechau summarized parts of his dissertation (“National Socialism and German Language”, Greifswald 1935) in the National Socialist monthly and listed synonyms for what he called “Jewish-Marxist lying press”, including “Jewish journals”.[9] The party’s official educational and speaker information material, published in 1938 by the Reich Propaganda Management of the NSDAP, includes comments on the anti-Semitic November pogroms in 1938 by foreign media as reactions of the “propaganda and lying press” which allegedly represented a new field of slander against the Reich.[10]

In several speeches by Joseph Goebbels from the first half of 1939, “Lügenpresse” is used to characterize the media abroad, especially in the future World War II opponents, the United States, France, and Great Britain.[11] At this point in time, the German domestic press had been “synchronized” (controlled) and a critical domestic press that the National Socialists referred to as the “Lügenpresse” no longer existed. The Nazi propaganda reacted to the false report of Max Schmeling’s death with an attack on the “foreign lying press”.[12] There were also variations in this terminology; the Völkischer Beobachter, for example, referred to the “emigrant and international lying press” to deny reports about the poor health of the imprisoned Carl von Ossietzky, [13] and in 1932, it rejected criticism of Rosenberg using the formula “Marxist lying press”.[14]

In 1942, Baldur von Schirach described the French journalist Geneviève Tabouis, who published reports on the expansion plans of National Socialism, as “the embodiment of this nifty lying press that was available to anyone who knew how to pay”; in the same context he claimed that “90 percent of all Paris newspapers” were under “Jewish influence” and that the newspaper editorial offices were staffed by “over 70 percent” Jews.[15]

The expression was also used in speeches at carnival events that were used to bolster the party.[16]

After the National Socialist Condor Legion bombed the city of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War and this led to appalled reactions in the world, General Franco’s propaganda accused the “Jewish lying press” of disinformation, claiming that this was a press maneuver by the Bolsheviks; this happened in harmony with the Nazi propaganda.[17][18]

In 1948, Walter Hagemann analyzed how the Nazi press used the accusation of the “lying press” against the foreign press. He observed that readers should be made aware of how vigilant and reliable German journalism and politics are on this point. The rejection of the Allied “horror reports” as products of the “Jewish journal” was part of this Nazi strategy.[19]