• BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Do you know what is meant by accessibility? I would have thought it is just an inverse score for complexity (high complexity -> low accessibility and vice versa)

    • copacetic@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      The site has this description:

      Complexity — How many rules and subsystems players need to learn

      Accessibility — How easy it is to find rules, starter sets, and learning resources

      Community — Size and activity of the player community and third-party content

      • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Thanks, I couldn’t find it… But I do not understand their rating of Savage worlds. You can play it with really basic rules and it still works fine. Its one of the core strengths of that system 😅

  • iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    See Pathfinder 2e is “high” complexity, check Lancer, “high” complexity… Bruh what is very high then?

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      …that site classifies shadowrun, GURPS, and invisible sun as high complexity; personally i’d rate AD+D, hârnmaster, and F.A.T.A.L. even higher…