• ThumYerk@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Let the players get paid whatever they can get. This only makes the rich owners richer, no wonder they want it.

  • mardegre@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only reason the premier league is attractive to players is the wages (sorry guys, it was never the dream of Mo Salah to spend his days in Liverpool weather) and the premier league is not suffering (yet) from lack of competition.

    Weird take

    • LUHG_HANI@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeh we don’t have the best weather granted but don’t tell me the UK isn’t one of if not the best countries to live and travel to play top flight football.

      • mardegre@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        To live not, I am pretty sure most players love warmer and sunnier place. But clearly to leave is not that bad at all, specially London.

        And of course Premier league is one of not the best league in the world. But it partially because of the league being able to attract talent with very high wages. The argument is a bit the chicken and the egg here I reckon

    • knickgooner10@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t agree with the first part, even if you don’t take into account wages the PL is still as attractive as any other big league outside of La Liga

  • MGHeinz@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Salary caps don’t aid parity, they just screw over labor for the sake of billionaires’ bottom line. It’s a myth owners tell fans to get them to be okay with it.

    "Revenue sharing* is what creates parity. Call me when the big European leagues starting doing that American-style.

  • DeapVally@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Players union won’t agree. The big clubs won’t agree. And it won’t stop off the books payments either, just like it didn’t stop Saracens in the rugby PL with their salary cap.

  • pinkguyfriedrice@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can think of a hundred ways to circumvent a wage cap. It wouldn’t make a difference even if implemented.

  • iVarun@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    One could have a 2 birds 1 stone approach by setting up a Minutes/Matches per 12 months Limit for players (NOT the clubs, who could play 200 matches a season if they want) and mandate that wages be per/Match (or per minutes, hour, etc. Can include availability in club training premises and so on).

    The over-exertion thing is mitigated, the wages thing is addressed without destroying clubs & players ability to negotiate for themselves.

    Clubs are happy since they get to play same number of fixtures (even more with Squad limits also increasing to say 30 or so).

    Lowly teams will have higher odds over the season to create upsets since bigger teams won’t be playing best 11 every single fixture.

    The only ones who’ll whine the most about these changes are the Fantasy League users.

  • NotClayMerritt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mind you, Steve Parish green lit his club paying Max Meyer, former wonder kid from Germany, £180k/week 5 years ago. If anyone took full advantage of the early benefits that came from the Premier League blossoming into the world’s most commercially successful league, it was him. He contributed to the problem and is now looking to put a cap on it because it doesn’t benefit him anymore. He misses the days where his club could spend £32 million on Benteke and that was as expensive as the flops use to be back then.

    Btw, while Steve Parish is the topic. He proposes we put a cap on the women’s game. The investment required to make the Crystal Palace women’s team competitive is comparatively small compared to every other aspect of running the men’s team. When they talk to the fans, he’ll happily say things like we need to spend to take the next step. But the same logic isn’t applied to the women’s game. He doesn’t get it and doesn’t even want to attempt to get it.