• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i don’t understand why any school or government would use proprietary software, even 20 years ago. sad that this is something we even feel the need to celebrate.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I gave a grapheneos phone (sadly Google got a registration) with sand boxed google store that I rarely use, Linux mint desktop, Linux mint laptop.

    My home has no natural light because no windows!

  • Heyla@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah we have fascism with macron, but…under linux 🤡

    Learn more about macron’s politics before be happy for us

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t a government entity in Belgium try to do the same thing until a bunch of Microsoft suits swooped in and “encouraged” them to stay with them instead? Hope France doesn’t do the same.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No standard, no custom government specific distro designed for the use case and ensuring stability and consistency… every department can choose their own.

      So similar fragmentation that underpins the issues Linux has with consumer confusion when trying to switch. There are too many options all with weird quirks that isn’t an issue for technical people, but is impossible for the average person to wade through to find good options for them.

      Maybe they’ll specify more in the future, but at the moment it looking more like expecting each large government department to make fundamental decisions on their core IT infrastructure on their own, as opposed to a dedicated and specialized team with experience.

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This makes total sense, since not ever department has the same needs.

        Also these are work computers, there is no “consumer confusion”- you get what everyone uses, that’s also one of the reasons windows is everywhere.

        Lastly, if rolling out different distros is a core decision in your IT you lack Linux experience in my opinion.

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fedora makes the most sense to me. But I can see how a cautious bunch might go for the perceived safety of Ubuntu.

          • alci@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Fedora being IBM, a US company, would make it a weird choice for “we need to be less dependant on US”…

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Linux, being the Linux Foundation, a US company, would make it a weird choice for “we need to be less dependent on the US” but, Western Europe being a load rather than a prime mover is nothing new.

              • alci@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I thought the Linux foundation was not a company… My bad, in the us , everything is business, isn’t it ?

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Per Wikipedia:

                  A company is a legal entity representing an association of legal persons with a shared objective, such as generating profit or benefiting society.

                  “Company” is a vague almost meaningless term, like “animal.”

                  The Linux Foundation is a 501©6 non-profit corporation. Americans are more likely to be familiar with 501©3, which covers charity organizations, such as the American Red Cross and St. Judes Children’s Research Hospital. 501©6 covers trade associations, like the American Medical Association, the American Bar Association, the National Association of Realtors and the US Chamber of Commerce.

                  As a trade association, the Linux Foundation is not itself a for-profit business, but they have a lot to do with for-profit businesses. Maintaining the world’s most popular kernel is chief among them.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      From what I remember reading; different ones, they’ve set no standard and let every department pursue their own needs.

        • alci@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          French “gendarmerie” has a long and quite successful experience with Linux… Something like 70000 PC, with a customized Ubuntu distro, since 2008.

      • rozodru@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        from an IT perspective NixOS would be VERY easy for them to setup. pretty much clone the same configuration across all computers and you’re good to go. PLUS if they installed comma with it would make the user experience easy. just have to teach people to open a terminal and type “, firefox” and you’re good to go. keeps things clean. don’t have to worry about people installing stuff that could potentially break their system as you would just lock down the nix configuration.