return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoDemocratic jockeying for the 2028 presidential election is already underwaywww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up170arrow-down15
arrow-up165arrow-down1external-linkDemocratic jockeying for the 2028 presidential election is already underwaywww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squaremakeshiftreaper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 day agoThat sentence does not inspire hope
minus-squarecandybrie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 hours agoIt’s not really meant to. But there will very likely still be elections that have Democrats in them. It’s just a question of how competently they make them a sham.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 day agoIt probably wasn’t meant to. But sham elections are still elections.
minus-squarepigup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoHot is cold, white is black, up is down.
minus-squareStiffneckedppl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoNo…they aren’t. That’s the whole point.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoThe argument here seems to be completely eliminate elections like the British monarchy vs sham elections like Putin. Either way it’s bad for America.
That sentence does not inspire hope
It’s not really meant to. But there will very likely still be elections that have Democrats in them. It’s just a question of how competently they make them a sham.
It probably wasn’t meant to.
But sham elections are still elections.
Hot is cold, white is black, up is down.
No…they aren’t. That’s the whole point.
The argument here seems to be completely eliminate elections like the British monarchy vs sham elections like Putin.
Either way it’s bad for America.