13% of Democrats agree with Trump on that.

What the actual fuck?

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The US has a growing fascism problem

    It does not go away with Trump. I wish democrats would address it instead of pointing at Trump like he’s an aberration

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      Fascism is the problem. Trump is a very notable symptom, but many others are also to blame for the fascism issue, including some democrats. I believe this fixation with Trump is due to people wanting simple answers to complex problems.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s funny because we’re almost all immigrants, so I guess we’re all poison?

    Ehh, then again there was that whole native genocide thing.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So, you mean everyone except the native Americans should leave America? Just trying to understand clearly the implications of what you’re suggesting :P

      In all seriousness, after all this time I would bet most people couldn’t trace a lineage to a single country now anyway.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They probably couldn’t. And Europe being what it is, a bunch of them would have lineage going back to a country that no longer exists, i.e. if they were of any of the states that were ultimately absorbed into unified Germany in the 1800’s.

        It’s all arbitrary. But we know damn well Trump and his goons don’t mean “white” people when they say “immigrants.”

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            This country, possibly your grandfathers or great-grandfathers (and in many cases grandmothes), went to war against Nazis, as did most of the world. There were a few fringe sympathizers, but they weren’t representative of “the greatest generation.”

            This shit is a new Nazi wave, and it’s not a continuation of something. It’s a flare-up of an old ugly root. All over the world these shits are gaining ground. New media empowers them.

            • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The idea that the world united against the horrible atrocities of the Nazis is post-war propaganda. Your average person didn’t know anything about what was going on until photos of the camps made their way home as we pushed into Germany itself. Most countries didn’t give a shit about the Nazis until they were on their doorstep. Most people said, “Hitler’s only saying that stuff to get elected. Once he’s in office, he’ll calm down, you’ll see.” And then they said, “Well, if we leave him alone, then he won’t bother us.”

              Many people across Europe and North America actually agreed with Hitler’s views about the Jews before “The Final Solution.” Antisemitism was common across Europe and North America, if not the globe. In Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to America as the sisterland across the ocean that shares his values.

              The phrase “Make America Great Again” was used by the pro-isolationism political group the America First Committee, who formed in 1940 and dissolved after the attack on Pearl Harbor, who largely opposed support for the UK. And they had over 800,000 members from all different backgrounds (from Democrats and Republicans to communists and anti-communists) with major tones of antisemitism and pro-fascist support amongst its leaders and speakers. They dissolved 4 days after Pearl Harbor and joined the war effort, not to fight the Nazis but to protect the US.

              The Nazis were inspired by the treatment of Native Americans when they started their camps, and we had our own camps for Japanese Americans. We hated the Chinese when they came here, and we hated the Irish as well. Most ethnic groups coming to the US settled in communities of their own culture from their homeland. That’s why the culture is so varied here, even across a single state. To quote somebody else, “Racism is as American as apple pie, and some people will see hatred of the first as hatred of the second.”

              I remember the days after 9/11, when attacks on black people doubled, attacks on Jews tripled, and Muslim parents were asking their kids if they wanted to change their name to something more American to avoid being bullied. That racism has always been present. It was just often couched in the lie of being edgy jokes or just that one racist uncle at the family party. The biggest differences today are that they’re no longer afraid to say it openly, and the number of young men caught up in the rhetoric of the online fascist pipeline that gives them a target to blame all the problems in their life on. The ironic racist jokes of their teen and childhood years stopped being ironic at some point and became their actual beliefs.

            • n2burns@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The idea that Nazi sympathisers were a fringe group is an vast oversimplification of history. Yes, America chose to fight against the Nazis, but there were huge racist/eugenist movements at the time that included high-ranking politicians and military personnel. Look up the America First movement for just one example.

              I first learned about this from the podcast ULTRA. I kept having to check their sources and do further research, because what they said sounded so wild that I felt I should have already known it. Instead it’s just another example of people not wanting to teach their uncomfortable history like the Tulsa race massacre, Indian residential schools in the US and Canada, the Tuskegee syphilis study, etc, etc, etc.

              Also, I’d suggest you learn about the history of Nazi Germay. The Nazis weren’t this huge supermajority of the German population, they just had people in the right positions, took power by force, and the populace went along with it. It’s not hard to see parallels with a lot of events in US history where if things went just a bit different the USA could have become a racist, authoritarian state.

            • Kintarian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              In 2016 they said it couldn’t happen here. They laughed at the idea of trump getting elected. They were shocked when he was elected and racism once again reared its ugly head. In Germany they said it couldn’t happen here and look what happened. Now we have Trump, the racists have come out of the woodwork, project 2025 was revealed and we’re very close to the end of America if we don’t do something.

  • Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Edit: And of course as expected, three people already came up to bat and readily swung and missed by getting too emotional with their responses. That’s not really taking the issue like an adult.

    I’m going to take a hit but I don’t care because I really have been talking to someone about this. Everyone is okay with immigration, until they have faced or been in situations where someone from another country is hired over someone who was naturally born in a country. Everyone is okay with immigration until a migrant is housed over someone who is naturally born.

    I have my problems with immigration. I don’t necessarily blame the individuals, well, some of them because some of the migrants I’ve come across have been quite socially unaware and absolutely refuse to like adapt to the atmosphere of the country they migrated to. And it can be frustrating to deal with. It’s not entirely their fault that businesses seem to see them as just labor fodder as well as the government sees them as economic fodder.

    It’s an issue that needs to be discussed and addressed. People don’t want to talk about it because they resort to just brandishing people as xenophobic. But I bet you may have a change of mind if you ever come across a couple of the scenarios I’ve exampled. We have problems in our country when it comes to the homeless, to the veterans and to the poor. I think it is absolutely unfair and unwarranted to prioritize thousands of migrants who come here over all of them.

    That is where I think the agreement is coming from. I don’t agree with Trump’s way of handling it (then again every “solution” he comes up with is incredibly extremist and impossible to pull off, especially if it’s coming from him.) I don’t agree also to have open borders either.

    We need to sit down and analyze the immigration policy closely, that has been broken for years. Why the hell have we not had a single politician yet that is running for presidency that has a solution by now? For christ sake.

    If we continue to not fix this problem, America just going to be weighed down the same way Canada got weighed down. The same way some parts of the EU got weighed down. America is just going to follow suit.

    But all we can say is “ugh, you so xenophobic” or “ugh, we’re all immigrants!”.

    Come on people, let’s be adults and actually address the issue to fix it, huh?

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I think you may have missed the point of the article. I don’t think it’s reasonable to assume democrats don’t want to do anything about immigration. Trump and Biden both have basically the same plan to address illegal immigration. Harris’ plan is similar to both of theirs as well.

      Illegal immigration is not nearly as serious as the average Republican might believe. They add strain to systems already working beyond their limits, but legal or illegal migrant workers aren’t displacing citizens at work and aren’t leading to the kinds of outcomes Mr. Trump would like his followers to believe. It does happen occasionally, but not enough to justify the alarming hate filled rhetoric.

      The problem is that “poisoning the blood” is nakedly racist. The phrase has been used for over 100 years as a dog whistle for white nationalism. How can you have a rational discussion about addressing the real problems that enable illegal immigrants (American businesses hiring them) or the additional strain they put on already over worked and under funded public services if one side is ideologically set on the notion that migrants are evil?

      I don’t think it’s reasonable to believe that democrats don’t want to address the border. Safe, legal migration into the United States benefits everyone. If we streamlined the legal immigration process and cracked down hard on businesses and individuals hiring undocumented migrants, that would address the bulk of migrants illegally crossing our borders.

      Perhaps we make it a felony with mandatory jail time (per infraction) to hire an undocumented worker or own a company that employs them. Or perhaps we remove the exemptions some types of businesses enjoy from paying minimum wage. One of the reasons businesses hire illegal immigrants in the first place is they are cheaper than American workers because you can pay them less than minimum wage.

      Right now there are a lot of businesses that benefit from cheap migrant labor, if we can break that trend, some of those businesses will fold, for sure. But do we want to let failed businesses that can’t stay open without breaking the laws of the United States to continue to operate?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      I’m going to take a hit but I don’t care because I really have been talking to someone about this. Everyone is okay with immigration, until they have faced or been in situations where someone from another country is hired over someone who was naturally born in a country.

      I guess they should have had better qualifications.

      Everyone is okay with immigration until a migrant is housed over someone who is naturally born.

      Are you repeating a JD Vance talking point here? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jd-vance-debate-immigration-housing-prices-real-estate-federal-reserve/

      some of the migrants I’ve come across have been quite socially unaware and absolutely refuse to like adapt to the atmosphere of the country they migrated to.

      That country being the “great melting pot” where those cultures get adopted by and integrated into society?

      People don’t want to talk about it because they resort to just brandishing people as xenophobic.

      Except all the people loudly talking about it all the time.

      I don’t agree also to have open borders either.

      Please name the people who want open borders.

      Why the hell have we not had a single politician yet that is running for presidency that has a solution by now?

      You mean why do they not have a solution you’ll accept.

      But all we can say is “ugh, you so xenophobic”

      Possibly.

      or “ugh, we’re all immigrants!”.

      Correct, unless you’re indigenous.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Correct, unless you’re indigenous.

        Really everyone came from somewhere else. If we all go back to where our most distant ancestors came from, that spot in Africa is going to be really crowded.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I’m willing to concede that while indigenous peoples are technically immigrants, they don’t really need to be viewed that way for practical purposes.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      Everyone is okay with immigration, until they have faced or been in situations where someone from another country is hired over someone who was naturally born in a country. Everyone is okay with immigration until a migrant is housed over someone who is naturally born.

      Uh…no, I have no problem with an immigrant getting a job in my country. Or having a place to live.

      If you aren’t okay with those, then when you say “immigration”, you might be thinking of “tourism”. If you’re not okay with immigrants having a job and a place to live, you’re not okay with tourism.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      47 minutes ago

      Everyone is okay with immigration, until they have faced or been in situations where someone from another country is hired over someone who was naturally born in a country.

      I have every right to be here as you do. Why should you get a job that we both applied for just because you were born here?

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I was at a Ska show last night. They played a tRump ad about the border before the music. We almost left. Surreal, honestly, for the type of crowd I would expect.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Music and politics are super weird. Paul Ryan, former Republican speaker of the house, was an RATM fan until Tom Morello told him to fuck off. Ann Coulter is a massive Deadhead. So is Tucker Carlson. There’s even a photo of Tucker hanging out with Jerry Garcia when he was in his 20s. The story is in an interview here if you can stomach it: https://www.maxraskin.com/interviews/interview-with-tucker-carlson

      And then there’s the musicians themselves- Johnny Ramone, Alice Cooper, Gene Simmons, all conservatives.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Music and right-wing politics are weird. I can’t even begin to count how many bands were proudly anti-war in the 70s. Then there’s the punk movement, which was highly critical of Reagan and Bush.

        I guess music and a message of hope/protest works better than a message of oppression, especially when appealing to youth.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Springsteen’s Born in the U.S.A. is about a Vietnam veteran who has been fucked over by the country he came back to.

          Reagan used it as part of his flag-waving “it’s morning in America” bullshit because no one listened to the lyrics beyond “I was born in the U.S.A.”

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, it’s like Trump playing CCR’s Fortunate Son. Fogerty was pissed.

            Some folks are born made to wave the flag Hoo, they’re red, white and blue And when the band plays “Hail to the chief” Ooh, they point the cannon at you, Lord

            It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no senator’s son, son It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no furtunate one, no

            Some folks are born silver spoon in hand Lord, don’t they help themselves, Lord? But when the taxman come to the door Lord, the house lookin’ like a rummage sale, yeah

            It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no millionaire’s son, no, no It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no fortunate one, no

            Yeah-yeah, some folks inherit star-spangled eyes Hoo, they send you down to war, Lord And when you ask 'em, “How much should we give?” Hoo, they only answer, “More, more, more, more”

            It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no military son, son, Lord It ain’t me, it ain’t me I ain’t no fortunate one, one

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              He also plays YMCA at the end of his rallies constantly. I guess his audience doesn’t know what that song is about or who The Village People even were.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The funny thing, though, is that the people who supported slavery also generally supported immigration. And I don’t mean by importing slaves (that too, of course). They wanted immigrants because they wanted America to grow. Sure, they didn’t want black immigrants, but that’s a whole other thing. When Chinese immigrants started pouring into California during the Gold Rush era, the response wasn’t, “immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country!” it was “Hey! Dirt cheap labor! And stay out of the buildings with the posted ‘no Chinese’ signs or else.”

      So even those people, awful as they were, wouldn’t agree.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        When Chinese immigrants started pouring into California during the Gold Rush era, the response wasn’t, “immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country!”

        Chinese Exclusion Act says hi.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Okay, fair point. But that wasn’t really a “poisoning the blood of our country” thing either. It was a “they tuk’r jerbs” situation.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Oh, no, there was definitely strong fears at the time that foreigners would ‘ruin’ America, and blood-related arguments were far more in vogue then than now. Even foreigners as white as the Irish and Germans.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            It was a ‘catholics are evil and all follow the commands of the pope so we can’t let them in, they’ll sell us all out to the European powers’ thing.

            Also Irish are all drunks and Italians are all criminals, unlike the wonderful people who populated this country who were the European upper crust of course, and not religious nut jobs and people fleeing debt or other crimes.

            Don’t get me started on antisemitism: https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-united-states-and-the-refugee-crisis-1938-41

            Roosevelt warned that even Jewish refugees could become a threat, aiding Nazi Germany in exchange for the lives of loved ones held hostage in Europe. The FBI warned Americans to be on guard. Neither the president nor the FBI were able to provide any specific examples of Jewish refugees committing acts of espionage or sabotage.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Not just fleeing debt or crimes. People tend to be pretty well familiar with the British Empire using Australia as a penal colony, but that didn’t really get going until after the American Revolution. Before that they just used the 13 Colonies. Not quite as far to travel, bit cheaper.

              We’ve largely blotted out that particular perception, though, replacing it with pilgrims in funny hats fleeing religious persecution. Which, there were those too, of course, but there was also quite a lot of every other sort of person.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For peace, he knew how monstrously cruel and evil the south was and that they would never tolerate black people as anything but chattel.

          Removing them made sense.

          I wish he wasn’t so kind and gentle, giving every slave owner to their slaves and walking away would have solved most of Americas problems to this day

  • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think this is also a problem of perspective: the US Democrats are only “left” when seen from inside the US political spectrum. Seen from the outside they barely reach a center position and would be considered conservative-right in many other countries.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      13% of any national group is enough to account for people who don’t have any good reason to identify with that group but do so because their friends or family did.

      Knowing what 13% of Democrats think tells you what the party is not, not what the party is. It’s irrelevant to the tired, old point that you’ve dragged out here.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And where in time does he draw the line where everyone after it is an immigrant?

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think it’s probably important to find out why this is, rather than just wag the finger and move on. Because, if the trend continues the non fascists will be outnumbered. In fact, I would say that this is really saying that 1/3rd of Americans feel free enough to say this. There’s a good chance there’s a silent amount afraid to say their true thoughts.

      If it’s just outside brainwashing, then investigate that. If there’s a genuine root concern that is causing this attitude, see if it can be reasonably addressed. If it’s just idiocracy happening, well then we’re all screwed.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I would posit the opposite - if the trend continues, fascists will shrink further. You gotta remember, horrors of the past are not that long ago. Wasn’t all that distant in our past when segregation had majority support, or blanket bans on nonwhite folk becoming naturalized citizens, or eugenics before that.

        If we beat them now, we can continue the next four years to fight to shrink the hold that fascist views have on our society still further.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean if you think they can be beaten, sure. As an outsider I don’t think I’d dare try to call the result of the US election for example and that’s probably a pretty good way to measure the level of fascism there no?

          My thinking is that there’s usually a root cause for this. If that’s something that can be addressed, then it probably should be looked into. I’m not ruling out that a large proportion of people are just stupid and/or easily led though.

          From my point of view I see a shift to the right happening in Europe too. So, there’s definitely a trend. The question for me, is why is it happening now? Outside influences for example?

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I mean if you think they can be beaten, sure. As an outsider I don’t think I’d dare try to call the result of the US election for example and that’s probably a pretty good way to measure the level of fascism there no?

            I would argue that there’s a big difference in supporting fascists and supporting fascist policies. Not because supporting fascists is meaningfully better, but because ignorance means that many people who support fascists, but not fascist policy, are salvageable outside of the tribalist borders of election season.

            God, the number of ‘swing voters’ you can have a conversation with and find out that they know nothing about either party’s actual politics is… just horrific. People who call themselves anti-gun-control and support stricter gun control measures than I, a Berniecrat, do. People who talk about the horrors of open borders, and then when you talk to them they support significantly liberalized immigration law and a path to citizenship. ‘Pro-life’ supporters who, if presented with the loosest abortion laws in this country, express support for such ‘reasonable’ measures.

            Not to be confused with embarrassed conservatives, who will take all those positions if pressed, but immediately revert once in friendly company. I’m talking about people I’ve given no hint of my politics to and no leading statements but suss out that they simply have no goddamn clue what they’re talking about.

            They’re the ~17% of the country that’s not fascist, but very well may hand over the country to fascists this coming election. And if that happens, they’ll genuinely have no fucking clue how fascism took power.

            They’re not good citizens. They are absolutely supporting fascism in this coming election. But in the long term, they can be saved. In the long-term, they don’t need to be a blight on this country’s politics.

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              God, the number of ‘swing voters’ you can have a conversation with and find out that they know nothing about either party’s actual politics is… just horrific. People who call themselves anti-gun-control and support stricter gun control measures than I, a Berniecrat, do. People who talk about the horrors of open borders, and then when you talk to them they support significantly liberalized immigration law and a path to citizenship. ‘Pro-life’ supporters who, if presented with the loosest abortion laws in this country, express support for such ‘reasonable’ measures.

              Here in the UK I sometimes think most people know more about US politics than domestic politics. So, I know how this kind of ignorance can happen.

              But then, if you’re suggesting talking to people with fascist views, then that’s also the point I’m making too. Because that’s finding out why they think the way they do and perhaps changing their mind by telling them which things they’ve been told were wrong all along. My experience has been that the indoctrinated people will listen to what you say, perhaps even agree. Then, in short order revert to the old talking points.

              Regarding the “embarrassed” conservatives. I wonder if they’re more just conservatives that are following the flow of their fellow conservatives, not really considering the full impact the result may have. You don’t need to look further than the running mate, to see how republicans are happy to endorse trump, even though they don’t stand for most of what he says. Because winning matters most. I wonder if some conservatives are casting a blind-eye to the fascist undertones, because overall they will otherwise get what they want?

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                But then, if you’re suggesting talking to people with fascist views, then that’s also the point I’m making too. Because that’s finding out why they think the way they do and perhaps changing their mind by telling them which things they’ve been told were wrong all along. My experience has been that the indoctrinated people will listen to what you say, perhaps even agree. Then, in short order revert to the old talking points.

                That’s what I mean about embarrassed conservatives - they’re a different (though also horrifically common) scenario than swing voters. Embarrassed conservatives (ie people with fascist views) are likely, in an anonymous poll, to fully fess up to thinking immigrants are ‘poisoning the blood’ of the country.

                The folks I’m talking about don’t hold fascist views, but they have all the ‘right’ tribalist labels, and no clue what they actually mean in terms of policy proposals. To them, it may as well be saying “I am Pro-Good and Anti-Bad”. If you ask them, in an anonymous poll, about a policy position or statement, you’ll likely get a response that’s not bugfuck insane - but their voting habits are indistinguishable, because they have no clue about the actual state of politics in this country. Or any country. Or of politics in general.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I wonder how many of those people are children of immigrants.

    (although, in a broader view, probably all of them are at least descendants of immigrants)

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Donald Trump is the child of an immigrant. His mother was from Scotland.

      Of course, that makes her the “right kind” of immigrant.

      And then there’s two of the mothers of four of his children. Ivana and Melania, both immigrants.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I agree. In fact, can we really be sure that any other billionaires might or might not be immigrants? We should probably round them all up just to be safe. We can deport the ones we think are immigrants and worry about the rest later.