• yrmp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because the material conditions of late stage capitalism that lead to fascism are inevitable.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Have you seen some of the wishy-washy mouth breathers in the “undecided” focus groups? I’m embarrassed to admit we’re the same species. The Trump cultists might be insane, brain-poisoned, sociopathic, fundamentalist idiots but at least they have the capacity to make a bad decision. The independents can’t seem to make any decision. It if they do, it’s based on some random nonsense or impulse. I dunno if they’ve got learning disorders or are just sad windsocks, but the fact that they are the ones who get to decide if America dies next month is terrifying.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think you have any idea who you’re describing. Of course it’s possible to find a couple dozen people who legitimately have no idea who to vote for, but you know it’s a lot easier to find millions of people who are going to stay home. As always, the real challenge is getting people to go vote.

      But you think this ultra-minority, that is barely in existence, is going to decide an election. By your reasoning, it doesn’t matter what anyone else does. Everyone else in the United States is powerless between now and election day. That’s your position, right? … But I think it’s just a cop out. You just want someone to blame if your candidate loses, and you certainly don’t want to blame yourself or your candidate.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      wishy-washy mouth breathers in the “undecided” focus groups

      This website is deteriorating into Democrats insulting non-Democrats constantly.

      You’re party is simply unpopular as it caters to “moderates” and then has to spend an absurd amount of money to convince regular folks that the Democrats are the best those folks are allowed to have. No amount of memes and insults is going to change this simple truth.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you’re claiming to be undecided on Trump in 2024, you’re full of shit. If you claim to be a moderate but still can’t decide between Trump and Harris, you’re not a moderate, you’re just full of shit

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I haven’t claimed to be any of those things.

          Edit: On a second reading, I think you are talking about “moderates in general.” I truely don’t understand how either party plans out their platform, nor what attracts people to them. (Outside of perhaps Sanders, who made too much sense I guess.)

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also because big business owns all the media and everyone can lie without consequences. Democracy can’t survive in these conditions.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      The electoral college takes it from a 45-55 to a 50-50. But what on God’s green earth gets him that 45% of the votes?

      • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        People who only loosely follow politics but liked the Obama economy that trump inherited and only watch Fox News. “He can’t possibly be worse than a demoncrat, he’s the same party as Reagan! It’s really sad how the media slanders him”

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you go by the polls, the two candidates are within margin of error of each other, or very close. We’re looking at a possibility that Trump would not only win the EC, but the overall popular vote, as well.

      The EC is not the only issue at play. Millions of Americans either like Trump or are willing to handwave his behavior away rather than vote for a Democrat.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        No Republican has won the popular vote in 22 years, and that was because of 9/11. Before that, it was George Bush Sr. in 1988.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nope, we won’t. I say that because my claim is specifically that the EC is not the only thing going on. If the EC breaks with the popular vote next month, it still won’t be the only thing going on.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                We’re looking at a possibility that Trump would not only win the EC, but the overall popular vote, as well.

                You claimed that Trump might win the popular vote, and that’s very, very unlikely (but not impossible). That’s the only part I was referring to.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Republicans don’t want the country to be educated.

    People with college degrees are overwhelmingly voting Harris. Republicans know that if we make the country smarter they’re screwed

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What is with this elitist attitude about college? I’ve met plenty of idiots with degrees and many educated people without. I hate that we essentially say people are stupid if they didn’t go to college or university

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you’re posting this right now because of recent poll data, It’s because Republican companies are creating their own polls just so that they can claim the race is closer than it is.

    Of course we don’t know who’s going to win. The election hasn’t happened yet. But any speculation about changes in the last few days should be taken with a grain of salt, because this is a playbook that was trotted out two years ago and it’s back again.

    • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t really understand it. I guess it’s because a close race drives turnout and they think their supporters need more encouragement than ours do?

  • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty sure it’s the economy. Despite the fact that the US economy has been reasonably well managed, by international standards, people are hurting – which is the perfect recipe for changing the governing party. Telling people that things aren’t as bad as they think they are makes you sound out of touch.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    it’s close because racism, jeebus, and guns. it seems like it should be more than that, but it isn’t. broke uneducated GOP voters literally don’t care about anything except for some combination of the above 3 things, because that’s what the 1% propaganda machine told them to do

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Let’s not forget the group that’s voting 3rd party due to the situation in Israel. Does it make sense to do, no, but they will do it.

      I’ve tried to discuss it in the ML communities but as soon as you start proving your points with solid facts they just delete everything you said, censored and banned, a bit ironic.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And the Dems will have very little affect (if any) on anyone’s jebus or guns. So it’s really just the racism that’s the distinguishing factor.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        4 days ago

        Dems will have very little affect (if any) on anyone’s jebus or guns

        and yet the bleating of “they’re trying to take yer gunnnnnnns” and “war on christmas/christianity” never ever fucking stops

        • Zachariah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s insane.

          And it’s far more likely that if the GOP had total control, they’d institute a national religion (good luck having your flavor picked for that one) and that they’d take away all the guns to protect their power (since there is clearly nothing they’d avoid doing if it meant getting/keeping power).

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The guns thing. There is a rather large swath of rural, liberal gun owners. If you’ve ever lived in a locale that lacks enough ambient light for you to see your hand in front of your face at night, you get it. If you live in a place where you can hear a car approaching from more than a mile away you get it.

      Let my handgun have a normal clip (average 9mm is 15 bullets) and we’re probably golden. And yet. DEMs lose moderate libs on this single issue.

      Yes, I own a handgun. Off the shelf with no mods it holds 18 per clip standard and comes with 2 clips.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        i live in the mountains in a town of ~3000. i can drive 30 miles without seeing a traffic light. and i also have a gun

        i’m still voting D, because i see that as a boneheaded thing to acquiesce to trump over. though to be fair, there IS NO valid defensible reason to vote for that incompetent pluted bloatocrat rapist coward

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          I have several. Not once have I actually felt like someone was coming to take them. Beto shot himself in the foot saying he would, especially in Texas.

          I like common sense gun laws. I took classes for my concealed carry. I can pass a test about the care and feeding of firearms any day of the week. No one except me has access to my guns.

          Of course I’m voting blue. They ain’t coming for my guns. And even if they were I’d still vote against Trump and fight them on it.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ofc not, and yet this is a single issue that motivates people.

          He is a rapist. A coward. A traitor. A cluster B personality disorder. And now he’s fraying around the edges from old age. The stress can’t be helping his decline.

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It makes a lot of sense for very rural living: you need a defense against the wild, and possibly hunting for food. I fully support that.

        The general desire among Democrats is stricter regulation, which is a very reasonable thing. People should be required to prove that they can be a responsible gun owner and are mentally fit to own one. I shouldn’t be able to pick one up from the sporting goods store like it’s a bag of potato chips. It is an incredibly powerful tool and can easily kill others. It should be treated as such.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I generally hear them water down the gun control, like a handgun with a stock number of bullets is generally ok. Or a rifle or shot gun. Unless you have some red flags, which you probably don’t have. Even in some of the stricter nations of gun control, there’s frequently some path for rural folks to at least have long guns.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Most people are poorer today in the day-to-day than they were 4 years ago.

    That’s why. It’s that simple.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        American voters do seem to have very short memories.

        Even faced with actual data that indicates that the economy has consistently performed better under Democrats over the past 75 years, they still pretend that the party of the oligarchs is somehow going to solve the problems of the working class.

        Donald Trump is very open about his own anti-labor policies as an employer, yet the very people who hate being screwed over by their bosses worship him.

        I don’t understand how anyone can function with this level of cognitive dissonance.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    For the same reason I got temp banned from this community. People only need to be slightly against the circlejerk to be pushed away from a community, and this creates a “well, might as well let everything burn” counter-resentment. I can’t vote in the US, but part of that reason is having prioritized society and consequences over ego and money. if I could I would vote against Trump, but it seems you guys are stuck doing it, and you reap what you sow. Stop being surprised pikachu-faced.

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    4 days ago

    Every time some ridiculous shit like this happens, I remember when Howard Dean yelled a little too loud and that invalidated his entire political career.

    • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even worse, apparently we only got the audio from his mic and it was an appropriately loud EEEEAAAAGH given the audience volume

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        He went on to run the DNC on the platform of healthcare reform and was instrumental in getting Obama elected with a supermajority trifecta. And then he was fired and Lieberman got to kill the public option.

        He offered too much to maintain cultural hegemony.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Been thinking this thought a lot lately. IIRC he was a decent man and likely would have been a decent president - but god forbid he get a little excited at a rally. Meanwhile, Trump has proven that literally nothing he could do or has done would change the mind of his voters. He could start and end every speech with a Howard Dean scream, and no one would even bat an eye.

       

      (And I seem to also recall hearing that the isolated microphone of his scream that we’ve all heard a hundred times did not reflect how it even sounded at the event.)