ummthatguy@lemmy.world to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · edit-21 year agoSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up189arrow-down1imageSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.worldummthatguy@lemmy.world to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoCrusher was only terrible to Q, who very much had it coming. And it was funny when she called him a pain in the ass.
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoTbf that is the correct way of interacting with Q
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThis list is missing Polasky. She wouldn’t beat the EMH, but she would tear a strip off you if you got injured doing something stupid.
minus-squareStillPaisleyCat@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoPulaski also seemed to be high functioning autistic, with researcher abrasive in the mix. Dr. Tracy Pollard of Discovery and head of Sickbay definitely had snark.
Crusher was only terrible to Q, who very much had it coming. And it was funny when she called him a pain in the ass.
Tbf that is the correct way of interacting with Q
This list is missing Polasky. She wouldn’t beat the EMH, but she would tear a strip off you if you got injured doing something stupid.
Pulaski also seemed to be high functioning autistic, with researcher abrasive in the mix.
Dr. Tracy Pollard of Discovery and head of Sickbay definitely had snark.