• TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Slave labor is a system in which a person is bought sold and indentured to a master for a substantial duration, often life. Their labor is coerced as property of that master.

        That is not how China produces cars. They use highly automated systems and paid workers like everywhere else. While Chinese workers are paid less due to the forces of unequal exchange (a system imposed by the US) and an export economy (a system usually imposed by the US but more of a 4D chess move by China to develop productive forces, with the US gladly taking the deal for exploitation), that is not really why the cars are so much cheaper. It is because China has highly concentrated industry and a much less financialized system.

        Speaking about “fair” is amazing in this context. The US is simply trying to protect domestic monopsony industry and to damage Chinese industry. This is a jingoistic and corporate policy.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Chattel slavery is different than indentured servitude. There is no ownership of the indentured servant, but they are forced to work against their will. This is the slavery found in Xinjiang, as well as the US penal system.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I didn’t mention chattel slavery or indentured servitude. There have been slave economies outside the American colonies / the United States.

            There is no evidence of slavery in Xinjiang, though there is a network of propagandists tied to Adrian Zenz, the US State Department, and the Australian equivalent who make dubious claims.

                • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  Its relevant. Having reduced buying power yet not risking loosing all of your buying power for the rest of your life is generally preferred.

                  Most people don’t realize how terrible it is in the US. Lots of migrants to the US searching for better pay, but they don’t realize how miserable life in the US is because most of their paycheck gets eaten by rent, transportation to work, healthcare, etc. And as soon as they manage to save anything, it all gets wiped out by a single hospital visit.

                  I don’t think Hollywood (how most people lean about the US) does a good job conveying how most people live in poverty in the US, how miserable they are, and how many of us kill ourselves because of the conditions.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s true but the logic applies. The EU is part of the imperial core that eats from that trough and in turn supports its maintainer. It is simply following the US’ lead.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Depends on which part of the EU you are in. There is a reason the poor of Poland move to places like the UK.

                Though this is neither here nor there as the original allegation was slave labor, which is simply a lie.