• luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get the idea, but I don’t see how that works effectively in practice. There are a lot of cards that are not good on their own, and only good in the context of a combo. Does having one of those cards in your deck make it better? No, it probably makes it worse. You need the entire combo for one of those cards to matter.

    It works for those 1 off value piece cards like Dockside, Tomb, Sol Ring, etc. But multi card combos is where I think it will fail(or at least over score a deck that doesn’t include a full combo).

    • Dr. Artemis Ph.D.@mstdn.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      @luxyr42 @mike Obviously we haven’t seen this enacted yet, but I wonder if it’ll end up being similar to the Arena Historic Brawl ranking system.
      I know Amazonian has run into issues where including a high-power card in a low-power deck bumps her up to a high-power tier despite playing a pile of durdle cards.
      I guess that’s what the conversation is for.
      But also, there’s never been a good way to rank commander deck power so *shrug* can’t be worse than what we already have

    • Mike@mtgzone.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I completely agree. There is so much context with all the cards that I don’t know how they do this. It’s really just four different ban lists they’re now managing. And that I think sucks so much fun out of the decks that it almost becomes what’s the point even.

    • LovesTha🦒@mtgjudge.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      @luxyr42 @mike It gives a ceiling, not a floor or average power level.

      Treating such system as not informing deck building is ignoring human behaviour. People will avoid including a single card from a higher tier than they enjoy playing. Unless it is worth bringing up in Rule 0 conversations and explaining that it isn’t a good way to think about this deck in particular.

      And players will treat a single card from +1 tier more kindly than they will treat a tier 1 deck including a tier 4 card.

      • luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I am also wondering who is going to actually handle ranking the tens of thousands of existing cards(gatherer says 28712 legal in commander at this moment), plus hundreds more from each set as they release. Might need to be crowdsourced to be done in a reasonable time. Every deckbuilding website is also going to want to implement that info in their database.