• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unfortunately those words are largely wasted IMO. If you read the text of the constitutional amendment itself you’ll note that the constitution itself would have only established the existence of the council. Every other detail of it is left up to legislation:

    the Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.”

    So again, why is this in the constitution? The Parliament could neuter it on a whim by passing a law at any point that established its composition is one guy and its sole function is to publish a pamphlet for sale in the Parliament gift shop. It wouldn’t make much difference if they could simply abolish it.

    • CalamityJoe@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because even with that additional wording was in the constitution, any law or changes that prevented the Voice from existing, and being able to make representations to Parliament, would be unconstitutional.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Alright, its sole function is to present that pamphlet to Parliament itself. Still pointless.