• salvador@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago
    1. What does mediabiasfactcheck.com have to do with russian economy and my original post?

    2. What makes it neutral and unbiased?

    3. A website can feed you a lot of bullshit whilst pretending to be unbiased, hard-core, independent “fact checker”. It’s even easier. I’ve seen this during the little-flu c-19 virus: the “fact check” websites were the greatest source of bullshit


    Go read some Brazilian, Indian sources, for instances, about Russian economy in 2022-2023. Or the ones from Malaysia, Indonesia. From the Middle East. Hungary, Serbia. These will be more or less neutral.

    You can even go listen to Alexander Mercouris – he’s from the UK.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago
      1. You wanted non-biased sources. You can check the bias on that website (My sources are not biased).

      2. Fact that the source has come from both within and outside of Russia and the articles are independently corroborated by third parties.

      3. It is not surprising to discover you don’t believe in facts. But you don’t have to. They believe in you!

      If you have any faith in any of your sources, send them over.

      Not that you even have a coherent argument and you’ve already been proved wrong or ignorant multiple times, so it doesn’t seem worth it.

      • salvador@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago
        1. “check bias”. I have. And?

        2. US and European sources - are also “non Russian” ones. Are they biased against Russia or not? The ones on the website that come from Russia itself - may also be biased. Why? Because there’re certain people, as in every country, who want to change the current government from within.

        3. On Youtube, listen, for instance, to:

        • a) Scott Ritter (US ex-marine, lived in Russia too) / Ask the inspector / he has a SubStack also

        • b) The New Atlas - by Brian Berletic

        • c) The Duran

        All these are english sources, and they all are knowlegable about Russia and geopolitics

          • salvador@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Because you asked me for them in (3) --> If you have any faith in any of your sources, send them over.

            Not?

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              But they are sources adrift, sources without a point.

              You didn’t know about the Russian shadow economy, so now you’ve learned about that and the associated Russian lies.

              You’ve at least acted like you didn’t know about the Russian Ukraine war, so now you know about that and the lies Russia told about that.

              But it doesn’t seem like you have any argument of your own, so why are you sharing sources?

              • salvador@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                But they are sources adrift, sources without a point.

                Without what point? They discuss the Russian economy too. Not always.

                You didn’t know about the Russian shadow economy, so now you’ve learned about that and the associated Russian lies.

                How do you whether know I knew or not? I didn’t tell you. Nor did I mention it in any way.

                You’ve at least acted like you didn’t know about the Russian Ukraine war, so now you know about that and the lies Russia told about that.

                What are you smoking?

                But it doesn’t seem like you have any argument of your own, so why are you sharing sources?

                Again - what are you smoking?

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Dude you can just say you were ignorant, it’s fine.

                  Nobody cares.

                  You’re learning, that’s a good thing.

                  Even if you apparently still don’t have a point. You don’t need one.

                  • salvador@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    You didn’t even understand my comments. It’s not that I hadn’t known about that – you made 2 baseless assumptions about my knowledge. Because it seemed to you so. Didn’t you?

                    If you’re a bit of moron, it’s fine :)