- cross-posted to:
- degrowth@slrpnk.net
- cross-posted to:
- degrowth@slrpnk.net
Neo-Luddism: Today, new technologies are being used to alter our lives, societies and working conditions no less profoundly than mechanical looms were used to transform those of the original Luddites. The excesses of big tech companies - Amazon’s inhumane exploitation of workers in warehouses driven by automation and machine vision, Uber’s gig-economy lobbying and disregard for labour law, Facebook’s unchecked extraction of unprecedented amounts of user data - are driving a public backlash that may contain the seeds of a neo-Luddite movement.
As Gavin Mueller writes in his new book on Luddism, our goal in taking up the Luddite banner should be “to study and learn from the history of past struggles, to recover the voices from past movements so that they might inform current ones”.
What would Luddism look like today? It won’t necessarily (or only) be a movement that takes up hammers against smart fridges, data servers and e-commerce warehouses. Instead, it would treat technology as a political and economic phenomenon that deserves to be critically scrutinised and democratically governed, rather than a grab bag of neat apps and gadgets.
New technologies should benefit users and society, not the billionaire owners that monetize the fuck out of our daily lives.
I wish I knew what that looks like. Hacking or DoSing Facebook/Twitter? Building alternatives to those? Building tooling so it’s easier for creators to get paid without ads?
I’m leaning toward the latter two options: Building/contributing to alternatives and promoting tooling owned/created for the creators (e.g. Faircamp as an alternative for Bandcamp, etc). As for the former, no need to hack or DoS them: just stop using them, and take as many people away with you as will follow. The big social sites are entirely dependent upon users, so drawing those away is much more effective.