• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s more about giving yourself a goal to work toward. Yes, things change and are not always within your ability to control. Be fluid with your goals, but continue to work for them.

      Example:

      My 5-year plan at work is to be promoted into management. My 5-year plan for retirement is to double what I’m investing each month. My 5-year plan for my house is to save up to build a backyard patio and rebuild my outdated deck.

      Easy-peasy. They’re not super specific, and when things happen, I’ll adjust to accommodate. But it gives me something to focus on in the long term.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Management? Fuck that, I don’t need to deal with more other people’s bullshit.

        Double what you’re investing each month? If you start with a dollar, you’ll be investing almost $17MM/mo. after two years. Maybe that’s not the best goal.

        The deck project is a good idea tho

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              “I currently make a monthly investment of $200 a month. In 5 years, I would like to have doubled that investment to $400 a month”

              Including the “monthly” in the original comment is admittedly unnecessary but I feel like it’s pretty obvious what they actually meant.

              • Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Including monthly is not unnecessary, it makes it mean something completely different than “double after 5 years”. As the other comment(s) should have indicated. So if that was what you wanted to say, then it was simply wrong to include it, not unnecessary.

                • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Wasn’t my comment, you can just sorta think “huh, that doesn’t make sense” and clearly some people will post smug comments and some will think “oh, they probably meant this perfectly reasonable alternative”.

                  • Eheran@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    True, it is easy to fall into the “no time left to think about something else” when trying to disprove someone. Kind of like not thinking about the pink elephant when someone mentions it. Your meta analysis is spot on and I am honestly sorry that I am this way. I constantly look for errors in everything.