Yup, it’s real. How did it get into production with

  • a flattened back tire with central hub very off-center,
  • right pedal on the left side, and very far below the cyclist’s leg,
  • chain routing defying common sense,
  • and a disjointed left glass?

At least the socks seem to be classic low-res stitch art likely by humans…

  • RaccoonBall@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Our family does secret santa, and my person bought me nothing but AI gen shirts.

    And not “hmm I wonder if this was generated” but like “wtf is that deformed thing there”

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s the “please kill me” eyes on every bit of small business AI slop that gets me.

  • Sausager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Hate to break it to you but those socks started being made by machines decades ago.

    Source - I’m assuming.

    • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think OP means that the “pixel art” was generated by humans, not that the socks were handmade

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read "Poorly Made in China by Paul Midler. In it, he recounts many of his stories working with manufacturers in China. In one part, he talks about a time he just drove off the highway to a random factory to see what they made. They were very accommodating and welcomed him in. They happily showed him their wares and even gave him some samples hoping to maybe get another American buyer.

      They made little figurines of Santa that said Feliz Navidad. They didn’t even know what it said and assumed it was English when presenting it to the author who is American. They probably got the molds from somewhere, found a supplier of raw materials, got some buyers, and went to town. At no point did they know or even care what it was they were making.

      With that context, it’s easy to see how this kind of thing can happen.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Zero people. The product being sold is themed socks. How do we sell more themed socks? Smash together words, generate an image, see if that sells. Yes? Great. No? Smash together words, generate an image, see if that sells. Repeat again and again.

      It doesn’t matter what the image is, if it sells it’s successful.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but who is dumb enough to buy a product with that slop on the box? What’s the kind of person falling for this junk? I mean it’s literal gutter trash.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The answer is anybody because no one is looking at the box art. People but things online all the time just to find out it’s the wrong size or the wrong color or doesn’t have the feature they thought.

          Nobody sees this and immediately thinks AI photo. They think, I want to see the socks, which they do and buy it. Maybe they see this AI logo, but it doesn’t register consciously.

          It is like the
          the trick with language 
          

          Where you only read “the” once.

            • MimicJar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Some people do. There are endless little language tricks that some people will catch and others won’t. Similarly there are endless visual tricks that some people will catch and others won’t.

              If you’re looking for a trick, it’ll be easier to spot. Any image posted to the “Fuck AI” community is going to have people looking at it. But put this online with 20 other socks for sale or at the checkout of a store and no one (realistically almost no one) is going to catch it.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wonder how much it would cost to have an actual artist make a shitty cartoon image for their logo. $100?

    E: there’s a bunch of ads on Fiverr for like $10-50

    • vodka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      From what I’ve seen recently, most of those fiverr gigs are scams that just gets you AI slop now…

      The actual artists have just been completely pushed away by an abundance of AI slop scammers.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Wonder where you got that. The ones I looked at had portfolios that didn’t look like anything like AI.

        E: WTF am I being downvoted for explaining what I saw?

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    LMAO What a wretched thing to have been allowed to exist…This is why I laugh at AIBros that think AI can create art.