In politics most people just critizise each other, but what did your local government actually do a good job on?

  • cricket97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    giving drugs to a drug addict is not helping them, sorry. and giving them money doesn’t remove all negative externalities, that is a ridiculous statement. It just makes them less desperate for cash, they are still in a full blown addiction being controlled by the drugs.

      • cricket97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why don’t you give them your money? Go minimize harm in your local community.

        Addicts quit because they hit rock bottom. They get to a point where they cannot sustain their lifestyle. You will be preventing them from ever getting to that point and they will be able to sustain their addiction indefinitely. Until the money runs out and they are more addicted than when they started. Free money never lasts forever.

          • cricket97@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I fucking hate when nerds request a source for something that is clearly an opinion or common sense. What are you disputing?

            • twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Common sense is extremely subjective.

              Is it really more effective to not help addicts than to use harm reduction methods?

              “Facts over feels” and all that.

              • cricket97@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There is a difference between harm reduction and giving addicts free drugs. You know this and are greatly oversimplifying the discussion.

        • TrickedPrivacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’d like to point out that it costs a society much less to supply one with heroin than it does to deal with all the thefts and crime that comes with the user having to fund an illegal black market, not to mention all the stabbings over drug territory.

          We need to grow some balls and be adult about this situation, what we’re doing hasn’t worked for the last 70 years and we may be nerds but if that means I know what I’m talking about then fuck yeah, beats staying in ones box and regurgitating the statue-quo.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps it would be better if you didn’t spoke about things you understand shit about

      • cricket97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good comment bro. Bet you felt smart writing that. Go give all your money to drug addicts bro its what the science says is best