Windows 11 is getting out of hand with its push for advertisments, frankly - remember the recent full-screen pop-up to persuade users to install Edge or other Microsoft services? Then another advertisment was placed in the Start menu, and now Microsoft has finally worn my temper thin - with a new Game Pass ad coming to the Settings app.

This will likely arrive in the July update for Windows 11, or at least it’s almost certain to do so. It was present in the latest preview update Microsoft just released for the OS (and quickly paused due to a bug, but that’s another story). It’s also worth noting that the ad has been present in earlier test versions of Windows 11.

  • Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wholeheartedly believe that all forma of unsolicited or public advertising should be completely banned. Nothing good comes from it, it is only a nuisance to everyone.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      But have you thought about a legal person’s right to fuck your eyes and brains?!

      Also, what about their freedom of speech… Shit lord

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because they are not “ads”

          They use the same propaganda tactics that governments in 20th century perfected

          Gets people going

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            5 months ago

            Imagine If I worked for Kellogs and I hired a guy to follow you and yell about how good corn flakes are every time you look at your phone, every time your TV shows go on a break, and every time you pass a billboard in your car, or a marquee on a building. Even if we assume that person does nothing else illegal somehow, that could easily still be harassment, which is definitely not free speech.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Tell that to the courts that’s who decided this degeneracy is acceptable.

              Don’t get me started on them spying

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’ve long know I wouldn’t make a good lawyer because you can’t say things like “Listen here you little shit” even when you’re right.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sure way to get some time in the hole haha

                  When corruption is the process, no amount of good argument will win tho.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’ve been called a sovereign citizen as an insult, though I’m just a voluntarist (not sure if ancap or generic anarchist), and that sometimes was past the point of me saying

                  things like “Listen here you little shit”

                  but I’ll admit “the society” wasn’t persuaded. Though sometimes it felt that possibly more than half of the people present agreed, but were confident that the majority doesn’t.

                  It’s actually a very good propaganda strategy - even if most people disagree with you (as the bad guy), what’s important is that they believe that others agree and thus keep their heads down.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      They should, but that’s never going to happen unless political lobbying is made very illegal (like life ruining and business bankrupting illegal, not slap on the wrist, cost of business illegal)

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We should be able to charge them for ad time. You want to paint an advertisement on my car you have to pay me. Why should it be any different when you want to put ads on my work computer screen when I’m working with clients?

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get what you’re saying but that still gives them unsolicited permission to post ads in the first place.

        I want an operating system, not an ad system that also happens to be an operating system

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      And it’s not like w11 is free, the price of a PC with Windows installed comes with its’ license’s costs. It’s not told to the consumer so they won’t even know they are using a product they paid for, for them it’s what a clean basic PC looks like. And that’s what prevents many to care about it the same way they can be frustrated by a paid streaming plan with ads. To take is as a given, and shifting the Overtone’s window of fucked up services even further.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t like solving things with regulation, because that’s always a victory in one battle making the enemy stronger for all the following ones.

        But doing this EU-style, like browser choice, only with operating systems, can be a solution.

        People love cheap and easy things. That’s how social media won over normal web. Seeing the choice between “install Fedora for freeeeeee” and “install Windows for 20$” significant amount will choose the former.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Doesn’t quite cut it.

            Now if there’s no other option or if the variant with Linux is labeled as “other” or “no OS”, and listed separately, normies still choose Windows 99% of cases. Sometimes they pirate it.

            They should have a clear choice in the store from a few OSes with details. Summaries with screenshots will do.

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because they own that wall. The owner of a wall (or poster space for that matter) can do whatever.

          • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh I own my computer, and I don’t get ads as a result. It’s not impossible. A Linux DE does not have ads and your browser can block them with various methods.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yup. If you use Windows, you need to accept what Microsoft does, because they control the OS. If you use Linux, you only need to accept what the software you install does, and there are a lot of options to select from.

              Feel free to complain when Microsoft does something stupid, but don’t expect Microsoft to do anything about it. If you want control, use something that preserves that control.

    • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Especially in a paid service, like why do I pay for these services if you’re still going to advertise, track, or datamine? I know the answer is greed, why profit off of one option when you can profit off of all of them, but I, the consumer, am fed up with the customer abuse.

      • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Shit, I’m a web developer and I’m fed up with all the ads, tracking and stalking that goes on. It’s so ingrained like “why not use Google for analytics?” or “just host it on Amazon.” 90% of the services we use at work I refuse to use at home (and go as far as outright blocking them).

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Exactly.

          Fortunately, my company doesn’t put ads in our product because it’s essentially a B2B product and customers pay a lot to use it, and our product being unusable could cost individual customers potentially millions if it blocks their day-to-day activities (we deal with regulations). We do use spyware though (e.g. fullstory), which makes sense given that lens, since being able to solve problems before they report them has a lot of value for our customers. If we did anything unethical, I would push back and potentially quit, since I’m not interested at all in manipulating customers (ads, dark patterns, etc).

          I don’t think the tools we use to catch issues in the field make ethical sense in other contexts though. So yeah, I block a lot of the stuff we use in our product, and we don’t do anything to actively counter blocking in our app either (if you block it, you don’t get the pre-emptive bug-fixing).

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        A regulatory change would obviously need to prevent them from hiding that kind in intentionally too long legalese TOS. It has to be a clear single acknowledge, not obfuscated or bundled with functionality.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      But how will the wealth addled convince us pleblians to spend money on worthless garbage? Or convince us that we’re ugly and not good enough so we buy their products? Oh the humanity!

      In all seriousness, advertising has had way too much of an influence on our culture and it needs to be properly regulated. I’m sick of being negged by beauty product ads.

  • HogsTooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    5 months ago

    People are abusing Google’s ad distro platform to get malware onto people’s machines. I see Microsoft signed up for the same firestorm of possibilities.

  • big_slap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 months ago

    I updated my work laptop, and they put their shitty copilot button on the bottom right and TURNED OFF MY SHOW DESKTOP BUTTON.

    nothing more to add, just wanted to vent with people who may understand my rage with windows lol

    • asparagapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you have adapted to it, rejoice! They are changing it back. Copilot will be a button beside Start button now.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s time to ditch Windows and all move to macOS or (even better) Linux

      • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        MacOS has different flaws but has major flaws nonetheless. Linux is the one that truly lets you own your computer, you decide everything.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree, I use Linux. But “normal people” aren’t able to install an operating system, and they can’t easily go to the shop and buy a Linux computer. They can buy a mac though. Still better than nothing.

          • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            For the money you save by buying similarly good hardware that isn’t from apple you can pay someone to install an OS

    • purplemonkeymad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea it annoys me too, you can switch it back, but I can’t do that every time I’m working on someone’s computer.

      • big_slap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah, I switched it back. for a split second, I just couldn’t believe they had the audacity to do that… lol

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Been 100% linux for like 6-9 months now, these stories make me thankful for finally making the switch.

      I’ve tried to make the switch 3-4 times in the past and was stopped by 2 main things:

      • Drivers / Laptops were tough to get set up
      • Gaming

      The experience was so much better this time and I really have no regrets. I don’t imagine I’ll ever run Windows again outside of a VM

      • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve been using Linux off and on for about 15 years now. It’s so much easier to use now compared to when I started. I understand why people might’ve avoided it in the past. But the list of excuses is getting pretty small these days.

      • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve been full time for a year and a half now. I tried switching a bunch of times before that and same problems as you. I love it now, it’s a pleasure to use my computer and know that it’s not doing any bullshit behind the scenes.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve kept Windows installed on a spare drive for years now. I don’t remember when I last booted into it on purpose, it was certainly more than a year ago, and was just to install Minecraft Bedrock to play with his friends (his friends bailed). My kids have only ever used Linux. :)

  • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Microsoft went too far in 2001 when they included a new online activation feature in Windows XP which spearheaded the future of drm and enshitification. They’ve been one-upping themselves ever since. All the most recent stuff is just more icing on the shit cake.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed, XP was the turning point - I decided I will never let such an intrusive software on my private computers, so I switched from Win2k to Linux.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        People think I’m nuts when I say Win2k was my favorite Windows. I switched to Linux before Vista came out. People say WinXP was good, but really, it was just tolerable.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          High five, brother :) I think the XP crowd was just the generation of “one step more tolerant towards privacy intrusions” / not quite computer knowledgeable enough to understand the implications of letting your operating system phone home. In terms of user interface, it was indeed tolerable - you could still configure it to look and behave like Win2K mostly, which is what I had to do for work for quite a long time.

          Compared to Win2k, it would just be a resource-hog. :/

    • Pyrarrows@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d say that the ‘modern’ era of Microsoft Enshittification started with IE4 as well as Windows 98. The Channel bar put ads on the Windows 95 & 98 desktops. It was easily disabled, but even that far back, Microsoft was starting to work on making their stuff suck just that much more.

      Next was Windows ME blocking DOS access, while still running on DOS, making the OS a bit … unstable, followed by your point of Software Activation in XP.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The thing that irks me the most is that those things work. They’ll see a little complain from the most vocal ones, and that’s it. The revenue will increase, their shareholders will be pleased, the OS will be worse, and we’ll have no viable alternative.

    Unless governments start to regulate the hell out of tech companies, it’s only downhill from there.

    Edit: about Linux, it’s not viable if you’re outside IT or rely on commercial software. That’s a debate for another post.

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agree with everything expect for the viable alternative. Linux is viable for many people

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Regarding Linux, what commercial software are you dependent on? More and more, it’s all online, even Office.

      • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Autodesk for myself, apparently its super dependant on .net and other windows framework so its not like they are going to make it linux compatible any time soon.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago
        • Adobe Creative Suite. They will probably never release a Linux version
        • Industry standard music production s/w
        • Offbeat collection of educational/research s/w, creators of which don’t know that Linux exists. They sometimes don’t even support MacOS
        • Office Suite which is compatible with MS Office shenanigans
        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re correct on all counts, but you’re also not a typical desktop user, you’re definitely a professional or power user with specific needs.

          The average user needs the ability to use a web browser and that’s honestly about it. That’s why Chromebooks are so popular with schools. A basic Linux desktop is quite capable for a standard user.

          For the things yoi need you’re correct that it’s not 1:1 and you’d need to move to open source alternatives or tinker with VMs/WINE to get those apps working and it would be a chore.

          • xavier666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is not me. But the kinds of people I’m encountered in my social circle. I’m in the CS/Research industry, so all my tools are linux compatible and have been a Linux user for the past decade.

            I think it’s better to have a realistic expectation of Linux rather than consider it a 1:1 Windows alternative. I agree with your last para fully.

      • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Adobe Creative Cloud, which despite the name is pretty much local. And although Microsoft Office works online, it has a series of issues that the desktop version doesn’t have, like broken formatting on Word.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is bullshit, and people will complain while continuing to use Windows so why should Microsoft care?

    • Meeper@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The thing is that they still hold an iron grip on most creative users as all their software doesn’t yet work on Linux. So we are left with little to no choice between enduring windows and Linux fanatics screaming “Just find an alternative software and relearn everything you’ve spent years learning and perfecting in your preferred one”

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lemmy folk forgetting that not every person cares enough to switch OSes.

      If you ever work tech support even at a basic level, you’ll see. It’s not even boomers or genZ. I helped a grown ass human who was my age at 40yo how to install a Firefox extension.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Can y’all IT people please stop with the condescending “you don’t know how stupid people are about computers”, it seems like there is always one of you showing up in a comment thread to tell us that we can’t have the future literally all of us want including you all as well… because WE are too stupid and lazy about computers.

        I helped a grown ass human who was my age at 40yo how to install a Firefox extension.

        Were you as condescending to them in person as you are being in referencing them right now? Why is not knowing how to install a Firefox extension some indicator of foreclosure on the possibility of that person becoming computer literate along whatever metrics you define? There are plenty of smart people out there who can learn how to use a computer for very complex tasks who have just simply never learned about extensions for Firefox. This is a very feasible and normal reality.

        Do you know how to change the oil on your car yourself? Do simple plumbing jobs? Could you run a classroom of middle schoolers and keep them all focused while keeping your eye on the shy sad kid in the back who tends to disappear if you don’t engage them? What about basic healthcare changes or cooking? What about outdoor work or basic small engine maintenance? Do you even know shit about the most basic species of trees in your backyard? Do you know the species of songbirds you often hear outside your window? Do you even pay attention to that? Do you know how to drive a dirt bike extremely fast on a rough dirt road? Do you know how to adjust for the violent explosive power of turbo lag in a car with a turbocharger so that torque oversteer doesn’t launch you off the road? Do you know how to sew and repair basic garments? To weave? Can you even fish? Like could you literally even just catch a fish to save your life right now if I handed you a fishing rod unassembled with no instructions?

        My point is, don’t go looking for confirmation of how stupid or lazy people are or how limited their capacity is to evolve and grow by casting the shapes of their ignorance onto the floor and trying to read some magic language from that.

        Maybe they don’t know because they are hopelesssly stupid, but maybe not? If they are intelligent and they don’t know computers then those are the perfect people to teach linux. Then it is their first language instead of windows, many linux distro are perfectly fine for this at this point.

        See here is the bottom line, legions of IT people show up online always arguing they think they know that the average person is too dumb, lazy and uninterested in computers for Linux adoption to seriously take off in the personal computer market and challenge Microsoft, but y’all don’t know shit about humans. You are experts in computers who think that makes you experts in human potential.

        Go take some theater classes (or get an degree in education) and get educated before you start drawing conclusions about people when you really haven’t spent time closely studying how people engage with their potential and what situations facilitate that in basic human interaction and framing of conversations (both literal and abstract).

        I’m sorry if I snapped at you but I think it is existentially important to recognize here that we don’t know what people are capable of, you can’t know the essential capacity of people to change, don’t try to predict it. Focus on creating the material opportunity for change and the rest may follow depending on what people desire, no matter to us, we desire to create that positive opportunity for change because it is the right thing to do, not because we like the future growth charts of the things we believe are important and vital.

        • velxundussa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree with the sentiment of your post, but I think the examples are a bit too far fetched:

          I’d wager most people use a computer/phone on a daily basis, which is why having a basic understanding of it seems like knowledge we should all have.

          Inversely, most people don’t need even have a turbo in their car and many don’t even have a car, so any knowledge relating to that is probably useless for them.

          That being said, even if someone is less knowledgeable in a field, respect should always be the baseline, as you illustrate, they’re probably skilled in something else!

          I’m saying that as an IT person that’s aware that I’m making money mostly because people don’t bother to learn all this, so in the end I don’t mind that much.

        • pycorax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I think you’re missing the point here. It’s more that people couldn’t even be bothered to search up how to do something (that takes seconds) that they want to do first, and instead just rely on someone they think is an expert without putting in any effort at all.

          Your examples don’t really make sense either as a lot of these are paid professions for larger tasks that most people simply don’t want to do. There’s a huge difference in searching online “how to install a Firefox extension” vs “how to do an weave”, etc.

          End of the day, the average person doesn’t care and if they truly did they’d have the initiative to have just researched it and done it on their own.

          Bringing it back to the whole thing about Linux, can you imagine how frustrating it would be to have to help debug a user’s Linux installation when they already need help with installing a browser add on? I work with tech and Linux on a daily basis and I already find it frustrating doing it for myself (fuck Nvidia drivers). No way am I gonna recommend it to someone else.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly. Look at Reddit/Lemmy where people ask questions instead of searching, when they could’ve gotten their answer faster by searching using their question as a query instead of posting it (i.e. LMGTFY). People are lazy in very weird ways, some are happier to call tech support than read an article, even if that call takes more than 2x as long as the search.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Bringing it back to the whole thing about Linux, can you imagine how frustrating it would be to have to help debug a user’s Linux installation when they already need help with installing a browser add on? I work with tech and Linux on a daily basis and I already find it frustrating doing it for myself (fuck Nvidia drivers). No way am I gonna recommend it to someone else.

            Are you honestly going to still claim at this late date of 2024 that a decent popular linux distro is actually going to be MORE of a headache than Windows?

            …?

            Have you tried Windows recently?

            • pycorax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m not sure why that is so hard to believe. I use Ubuntu and Windows at work daily and Windows at home. I know the challenges of both and Windows at worst just annoys me with them forcing the new Outlook app on me. Everything else just works. Plays games amazingly, Visual Studio is uncontested, syncs nicely with my Android phone and I have no driver issues whatsoever. Don’t have to go diving into the command line to change settings either.

              The only time Linux works perfectly for me is on my Steam Deck and that’s entirely because Valve has handled all the driver issues for us on that hardware.

              • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Outlook is atrocious what on earth are you talking about? Just trying to use it at work it is so frustrating and the UI is horrendous for everything. Truly even basic things like trying to read when a meeting actually starts just from looking at the calendar is a headache, and because all of this is proprietary unlike with Linux, tough luck, that is how things are and you can’t do shit to change it. Neither can an experienced computer user trying to help you.

                I am sorry you really don’t have an accurate handle on the state of things anymore, I think you are stuck in your ways and stressed out by life and you don’t realize that emotion and lack of mental plasticity is leading to you assume everyone else is as stuck in their ways as you (including your future self when you are able to feel less overworked and stressed).

                Windows is atrocious at this point, search doesn’t work and purposefully confuses new computer users about where is being searched and what is being searched. Ads pop up everywhere in the UI and will continue to spread like a terminal cancer in the UI.

                Search on windows also just sucks and takes ages with the default settings (an inexperienced computer user will be using).

                The file manager on windows in most marquee windows programs like word, excel etc… all open up an entirely different file manager half way through the process of saving a file in perhaps the most insane UI pattern to keep from the mess that was Windows 8 (even though I actually really liked the core idea at first).

                Windows is buggy AND windows is constantly playing head games with its user by trying to force them to use the edge browser. It is very very confusing to a new computer user what the hell is even going on.

                I mean, Windows illegally changed the entire operating system countless people had without getting consent because it would look good for their numbers.

                Seriously you are WAYYY out of your league if you are going to claim a nice Linux distribution on good hardware with good driver support (such as some dells or thinkpads) is categorically wayyy worse than trying to use a windows laptop in 2024….

                …please get your head out of the sand :)

                I mean do you want to get into the massive security vulnerability at a tactical and strategic level that Microsoft’s co-pilot represents? This is endgame for business security, Windows is in a worse spot than it has been in probably a decade at least and they deserve it. IT people and corporations have to seriously wonder if Windows even cares about following the law, which makes trusting Windows for the software relied upon by their company a complex question indeed……

                It used to be that Linux was better ideologically because it gave you agency over your computer, but now things have gotten so much worse that the reason is practical and no longer ideological.

                • pycorax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I don’t think you’re talking about the Outlook I am talking about because I’m talking about the Outlook Mail and Calendar apps, not the Office ones. And that’s fine and dandy about proprietary software and all but frankly I haven’t really seen any non-proprietary mail apps that look aesthetically pleasing. But that’s besides the point, it’s a matter of personal preference when it comes to visuals after all.

                  You don’t have to come here and assume you know everything about me simply from my choice of OS and invalidating my experiences with personal attacks no less. If your rant here is trying to convince me or anyone else who is reading that we should abandon Windows because of the reasons, you have stated, you are failing terribly I’m afraid. Not everyone has such high standards as you have and it’s frankly patronizing for you to think that I or anyone else have not considered these options when it affects our workflow. If anything, people reading this are gonna be dissuaded of Linux because if this is the kind of tone and experience we’re going to get when we try to, well, it’s a lot less stressful staying away from Linux.

                  It’s somewhat concerning that you have such a strong obsession over the topic that you would go and whether intentionally or unintentionally offend people and I hope that you are a much more pleasant person to converse with outside of this topic or even this site.

                  I’d also like to add, nowhere did I ever mention using laptops. All my experiences are with desktops that I had a hand in building from scratch. So I’m not sure what you’re even getting at with those assumptions.

                  Have a good day sir.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Excellent rant, I hate that doomer mindset. Old people used DOS, kids figure out vpns to get on gambling sites. People aren’t stupid they just haven’t had a reason to learn, or didn’t have someone to make them care.

        • Agrivar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Awesome post. As a former IT person who has worn many other hats over the years, I couldn’t agree with you more.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lemmy folk forgetting that not every person cares enough to switch OSes.

        Right, so if they don’t care they’re not going to complain very much about it. If they are going to complain what are they going to do about it? If it’s “just complain and nothing else” then Microsoft doesn’t care.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So are you volunteering to install Linux on everyone’s machines when they get a new computer? And answer their tech support questions when they inevitably need that one program?

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m volunteering to install Linux on my machine instead of just bitching about Microsoft while continuing to use Windows.

            I don’t see how pointing out the reality of “if you’re not going to stop using Windows then Microsoft doesn’t care what you think” somehow makes me responsible for every computer in the world.

  • TeddE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    What’s next Microsoft? Replace the windows os loading windows page with a 30s ad? Or have defender uninstall apps if a competitor pays enough? Maybe capture a screenshot of my screen every 3 seconds for AI analysis?

      • TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah. I’ve been advocating for Linux for decades. For decades I’ve been trying to convince people to switch on its own merits, but none of that has been effective.

        It took Microsoft sabotaging their product for me to see the needle shift. So I’m done trying to convince people with carrots, it’s time for Microsoft to convince the masses with sticks.

        • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah I think the masses are going to be a tough sell on Linux until computer manufacturers start offering Linux builds with a pre-installed instance.

          I’m sure there are places that do it but there’s probably money to be made in just setting up Linux on machines for people.

          • zingo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah I think the masses are going to be a tough sell on Linux until computer manufacturers start offering Linux builds with a pre-installed instance.

            Everyone’s family needs a tech geek to install Linux on a brand new computer.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I legitimately, non-ironically, prefer Edge over Chrome, and I cannot explain why; possibly brain damage, possibly too lazy to download Chrome or Firefox and setup my account for either.

      • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        For me it’s a pragmatic desire to share information with as few megacorporations as possible.

        I deal with MSFT for so many other things, not all by choice - and Edge does everything I need it to do.

        As with many such questions, it’s about the trade-off you are prepared to accept.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Edge and Chrome are basically very similar at this point. Firefox is my browser of choice these days. It’s not perfect, but at least it isn’t anti-adblocking and doesn’t freak out when I block 8.8.8.8 like Chrome and the Google devices in my house. I’m moving away from Google as they move away from not being evil. Moving to self hosted stuff as much as I can for photos, email, file storage, and soon, home automation.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I switched to Linux Mint Debian edition when the Reddit thing happened. I’m glad I did before Windows got this bad.

    • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I made the swap after they forced Windows 7 update behavior to change. You used to be able to download updates but you got to choose when to install them. Then they changed it to either they’re on and fully automatic, or fully off.

      At the time, I was running a computer repair company, and my work computer running Win7 was running a data recovery on an accidentally formatted drive for almost two days. After I had left and the program finished, Windows was all “Oh, the computer is idle now. Let me give you a 15 minute warning that I’m going to install updates and reboot if you don’t cancel”.

      After the second time, I formatted my work computer. Shortly after, I did the same to my gaming PC. Haven’t looked back once.

      • JCreazy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I love to hear it. Linux has done pretty much everything I’ve needed it to to and it’s great to see a lot of programs are available for Linux natively.

        • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think my favorite part of swapping has been forgetting how Windows does things. I’m so embedded in Linux and how it works every day that I don’t remember where to go for certain things in Windows without having to search.

          I remember some power user shortcuts like run prompt shortcuts (appwiz.cpl or control userpasswords2) but I used to be able to walk people through how to get certain pages in the Windows UI, and I couldn’t do it today.

  • GreenStar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Tbh me switching to Debian (using the KDE desktop experience) is feeling better and better, my PC runs over 3x faster, I have way more control over my own device, and everything works better than ever!

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hopefully they’ll end up with an incredible amount of user telemetry telling them that they’ve created the least adopted version of Windows in the history of the company.

    That’s what Windows 11 deserves, they need a punch in the face from users.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      they’ve created the least adopted version of Windows in the history

      could be tough to beat “Windows ME”… ;-)

    • riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wish, but what are the end users going to do? Switch?

      Apple is expensive, and all Linux users will eventually have to use a command line. Sure, if you’re on lemmy you’re probably fine with the occasional terminal window, but most older folks aren’t, and many in the younger generation aren’t familiar with any os that doesn’t come on a mobile device.

      Power users have an alternative in Linux, but most will just shrug and accept it. Who has time to learn how to use and install a new OS? Ads are everywhere, it’s become ewww the norm.

      ewww

      Fwiw, it may be arguably easier for you to switch than to have to run a debloater script after every Windows update, at this point.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Microsoft is so confident in its desktop marketshare that they allow themselves to push the overton window on what users will tolerate.

    The only competitor they can lose users to is Apple. And even then not everyone can afford an Apple computer, especially in the rest of the world

    • nadram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Forget Apple. Without buying any new hardware, i managed to replace Windows with Ubuntu just a month ago. My most hated moment on windows was the time i saw the onedrive ad in file explorer… That felt way too intrusive.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dont forget that the vast majority of users either doesnt know Linux, distrusts Linux, has heard rumors at any point in time about some feature or component not working as perfectly as under windows, is uninterested in computers beyond their daily usage function, or finds themselves in a social circle or job environment hostile to Linux.

        What Linux needs to get widely adopted is settle for one central distro, iron out all bugs and compatibility issues and do a bunch of testing with windows users to determine what differences they are confused by. The goal must be to create total feature and compatibility parity with windows, and make the whole process so incredibly simple that even absolute morons with zero interest in computers can both use it instinctively and not miss anything their windows used to do. Then run a massive adoption campaign.

        Now I know many aspects of this are directly opposed to the fos ethos, but if Linux ever wants to claim market share they need to spend big on it and pick up the users where they are; in a place of zero user ability and a lot of ignorance.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          i think the only way Linux is increasing it’s market share beyond fringe enthusiasts (that’s us) is by more devices coming with it pre-installed. expecting anyone outside of the tech space to change the operating system their device came with is a pipe dream

          • jas0n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Get it in the schools. It’s a bad habit from many people’s childhood that they need to break. Make that original habit not suck.

          • mtchristo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            OEM have no incentive to ship Linux in their laptops. Plus they get discounts from Microsoft for using windows. So that’s not gonna happen

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          What Linux needs to get widely adopted is settle for one central distro

          One central distro guarantees its eventual enshittification. I’m happy with the knowledge that if my distro enshittifies I can just move to a different one.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not saying we should shutter all the others or make a Linux for profit corporation, just that if there is a sort of “base” Linux that can be used and referenced as universally as windows, with the same capability, stability and compatibility, catering to the same crowd of dumbest possible user, that would go a long way in my opinion in getting Linux more widely adopted.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I believe Mint is designed for ease of installation and use, and similarity to Windows.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          finds themselves in a social circle or job environment hostile to Linux.

          Ugh. Tell me about it.

          I haven’t tried to run the latest Corel graphics suite in Wine recently, but the last time I did it exploded in my face so spectacularly I think my eyebrows still haven’t fully grown back. I really need that to work for… work. Basically everything else I already use is FOSS anyway.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve never actually seen an ad in Windows… Like, literally ever. The worst I’ve seen is Windows trying to trick me into making edge my default browser.

    If I believed all the articles on Lemmy, every part of the OS now has embedded ads, and the OS itself is recording everything I ever do against my will and without my knowledge.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I see ads pretty much everyday in Windows. They’re not as attention grabbing as traditional ads and I think this is part of why some people don’t see them.

    • thequickben@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve personally seen ads in the start menu. It was my last straw, convincing me to move to Linux full time.

    • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Windows is selling data from what you do and making money and you just aren’t noticing the ads are tailored to you.

      It’s the type of thing that seems harmless, unless you are a woman searching for an abortion provider and Microsoft sells that, and then an ultra-right wing religious majority comes to power and decides to retroactively put to death all women who have had an abortion and use that data to put you to death.

      This surveilance mechanism is mostly harmless… until one day it’s not.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea same here. In all my years using a computer, I’ve never seen such a thing aside from “preinstalled” apps. Is this a regional thing?

    • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      0 ads too, windows 11 last update. Lemmy circlejerk is pretty much this. These threads are either fake news or ragebait, and the comments are just uninformed/untested opinions.

      That without saying that win11 ltsc exists now. At least is something to test.

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The second part is probably true, but ya, also don’t encounter too many ads except for like some default game programs or something installed with the OS that are easy to remove from the Start menu and then you never see them again.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      when was the last time you installed windows? Also, what version? If you’ve only ever had it set up for you, then you may have only used windows that had already been cleaned of all the bullshit. This includes pc s provided by your work.

      For win10, the install iso provided by microsoft puts ads for games in the windows store in the default start menu. I have installed many win10 pc s over the years, and candy crush (among others) is always there.