• PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    While I mostly agree with you, econ101 is a pretty poor argument; early econ courses (like intro to micro and macro) are notoriously not grounded in reality.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      econ101 is a pretty poor argument;

      You can argue about the goals of economic policy, but that’s very different from arguing the effects.

      What is the response to rising labor demand? Do you

      • Independently raise wages to the bid price?

      Or

      • Form a cartel to fix wages below the clearing floor?

      The former is the “natural” response you learn about in 101, assuming a naive approach to the problem. The latter is what you learn works best in 201, when your goal is profit maximization.